In news coming out of Yemen, the UK Guardian is reporting that “soldiers and plain-clothed government loyalists opened fired on protesters trying to march through the Yemeni capital” Sana’a earlier today, killing “at least” 35 people, including a child, and wounding hundreds.
Witnesses say the first shots were fired by security forces trying to disperse the protesters and they were joined by plain-clothed men who fired on the demonstrators with Kalashnikovs from the roofs of nearby houses….
“They shot people in the back of the head as they were running away,” said Mohammed al-Jamil, an Indian doctor treating the wounded. “Whoever did this wanted these people to die.”
The violent attack on demonstrators, who have been protesting the rule of President Ali Abdullah Saleh, is not the first, but it is the most deadly in recent weeks in this country which fought a bloody civil war in the 1990s. The opposition is a disparate group of Islamists, socialists, Houthi, tribalists, and southern secessionists who seek a return to the days when South Yemen ruled itself. Al Qaeda has pledged support to the opposition, but has not been welcomed by the latter.
Just a week ago, the U.S. gave strong support to a supposed “reform” initiative proposed by Saleh (emphasis added):
“The idea of the president’s downfall is not a real solution to the country’s woes,” U.S. Ambassador Gerald Feierstein said in an interview with the state daily al-Syasiah….
Meanwhile, EU called for all Yemeni political parties to positively respond to the Thursday’s reform initiative of President Saleh, urging them to engage in an open and constructive dialogue….
The government said that while security forces are busy protecting the protests, al-Qaida wing on Friday gunned down four more policemen on a patrol vehicle in southeast province of Hadramout, bringing the death toll of security and army personnel targeted by the terrorist group to 20 since Feb. 11.
US President Barack Obama’s top anti-terror advisor John Brennan on Friday called Yemen’s President Ali Abdullah Saleh to welcome his pledge to devolve power and urged the opposition to support the plan.
The Saleh government’s lies about protecting protesters has been met by the truth of many dead. Xinhua is reporting this morning 41 dead, including a child, and more than 200 wounded.
This blood is partly on the hands of U.S. and EU leaders who are propping up a murderous, corrupt dictator — including by drone assassinations — while claiming the mantle of justice while attacking another dictator in Libya. The main difference? Libya has a lot of oil, while Yemen is running out of oil.
The cynicism of the Obama administration knows no bounds. Will the American press, which follows the rulers of America like a puppy dog, raise a fuss over this atrocity? Not while U.S. forces are operating in Yemen, and the administration screams about terrorists. While Al Qaeda is present in Yemen, the vast majority of the protesters have legitimate grievances, if not at times at odds with each other, as the opposition is quite fractious.
So while the eyes of the world are on Libya and the Japanese nuclear reactors, U.S. ally Saleh is given the green light to shoot protesters down in the street.
Where is the conscience of this country? Has militarism and fear completely taken hold so that, as I imagine the Pentagon and intelligence community believe at this point, the U.S. Executive Branch can do whatever they want, that there are no real consequences?



42 Comments

Just another day in the news cycle…
How inured to violence and support of dictators have we become? Once again we will hear how maybe Obama doesn’t understand, or doesn’t have a choice.
The mendacity of our times is outstanding.
Yemen expert Gregory D. Johnsen‘s Twitter feed:
http://twitter.com/gregorydjohnsen
You’re on the same line of thought as Craig Murray today:
US Sponsored Massacre in Yemen; Craig Murray; 3/18/11
This is the post in its entirety:
Thanks, Harpie. I hadn’t time to check the Twitter feeds yet. Following Gregory Johnsen’s feed, I found this from one of his retweets, by someone named mabmbarek:
Others are calling it the most deadly toll since the various uprisings and protests around the Arab world began last year.
doesn’t have a choice ?!?!
Emptywheel reminds us that no one was forcing Obama’s hand when he went beyond even Bush/Cheney’s prohibitions on Child Soldiers:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/10/26/the-same-day-us-gets-guilty-plea-from-child-soldier-it-exempts-yemen-and-others-from-restrictions-on-using-child-soldiers/
and there is also the vastly under reported matter of Obama’s personal insistence that falsely jailed and convicted Yemeni journalist Abdul-Elah Haidar Shaye remain imprisoned – even after Saleh announced clemency – his only crime (like Bradley Manning) was embarrassing USG
http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/02/obama-intervention-puts-yemen-reporter-in-jail/
thanks Jeff, rec.
It’s not hard to see what’s in front of your eyes. What’s possibly only a little more difficult is to swallow it and believe your government has any moral authority.
Wow, thanks cbl. I had not heard of Shaye’s case and Obama’s intervention. From the article you link to:
.
The Audacity of Hopelessness.
You’re “clearly” in good company! ;-)
along with our own fabulous @Siun -
I follow @JNovak_Yemen and @ionacraig
for everything Yemen
This is Gregory D. Johnsen’s Blog.
http://bigthink.com/blogs/waq-al-waq
Thanks so much, cbl! My first thought when I read it was also: “like Bradley Manning”. ugh.
Also, at the end of that emptywheel post, Marcy links to a discussion I had with powwow which may interest those who would like to know how the USG came to support Saleh.
oooh thankee
More from Twitter:
I didn’t note this in the article, but South Yemen, which was once allied to the Soviet Union, and before that, largely related to the former British colony in Aden, was one of the few secular governments in the Arab world. The U.S. used Islamists to drive out secular governments aligned with the left throughout the Middle East and Islamic portions of Asia. Now they cry about Islamic terrorists who they bankrolled through the 1980s and 1990s.
The psychological truth behind the 9/11 truther movement is that no matter how the logistics of 9/11 occurred, the main cause was the massive support to Islamic fundamentalism, particularly of the Shia variety [wrong: I meant of the Sunni variety], by the U.S. and its allies, using murderous violence to kill and outlaw leftist, union, and secular portions of a number of different countries. It bothers them no end that a secular and leftist group still exists in Yemen (the Yemen Socialist Party had a 20% vote at “unification”, with most of the their support from South Yemen where they were once a majority party).
Thanks, Jeff; I have been reading about it at the Guardian, too, and at AJE:
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/03/2011318115434957754.html
What’s happening in Bahrain is also huge, and that Gates met with King al-Kahlifa just last week…and Saudi Arabia is spitting in his eye, and Clinton’s eye, and rolling tanks in to help fight against the Shia majority protestors. Look a the weapons sales numbers to the GCC; it’s obscene, and says a lot about geo-politics and business interests.
Our foreign policy is depraved. AND incoherent.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175367/tomgram%3A_nick_turse%2C_the_pentagon_and_murder_in_bahrain/#more
Isn’t most Islamic fundamentalism Sunni? In Asia, it isn’t liked well, and the proponents are often known as “Wahhabis”. It’s been the term since the 1800s. Refers to Arab foreigners who bring fundamentalism and try to foment religious violence. Hyderabadi Muslims complained to the British Crown about it in the 1880s, and demanded that Arabs be banned from serving on the Qazi Courts there. Probably wasn’t the CIA at that point, but I’m sure the truthers could make a case for it.
The U.S. did make use of this violence, no ifs ands or buts. It did not create it. That’s just an abuse of history.
Yup. The Saudis are by far the most conservative Wahabis — the Taliban was essentially founded and run by rich Saudi trust-fund babies who wanted to do a combination of Saudi Arabia and John Norman’s Gor novels — but unfortunately they have (or had — as the WikiLeaks cables showed, their proven reserves aren’t quite as big as they claim and it’s looking like they’re past their peak) a ton of really easy-to-refine petrol, so they’re rich enough to throw their weight around. Also unfortunately, the image of Islam in the west is largely built around the Saudis or the Talib (Saudi East, essentially), because elsewhere in the world Muslim women have considerably more rights; in Iran at least one woman is an Ayatollah.
“Our foreign policy is depraved. AND incoherent.”
Ditto O’s econ policy.
C’mon Barry, how about a no fly zone here?
Re Sunni Islam and fundamentalism, you are correct, and I wrote the wrong word. Thanks for making the point, and I corrected my comment accordingly.
I agree that the U.S. didn’t create these divisions and this violence, but by backing one group against another, they tilted the historical and political process, especially by eviscerating secularizing or leftist portions of these societies.
Yay! That’s nearly as many as the US government itself murdered with a drone strike in Pakistan today! The US and Yemeni governments are just *awesome*! \s
Yes, I wanted to put in something on Bahrain, and I’m very glad you pointed it out here. I was quite constrained for time writing this. One could also point out that the political processes in Tunisia and Egypt remain quite fluid, and very little reporting makes the front pages of the press now. But you can assume that H. Clinton’s trip to Tunisia the other day was about pushing U.S. interests in the region, which is what the U.S. is all about. Democracy is a convenient cover, and when they need a good dictator, they don’t hesitate.
What’s amazing is that people here in the U.S. continue to buy this shit. How convenient that Qaddafi appears on the scene with his own set of atrocities to make the U.S. and European powers look like they give a shit. But like draft animals with blinders on, the U.S. press only sees Libya, and Bahrain and Yemen are relegated to the back pages, if they are reported on at all.
A no fly zone in Libya is window dressing as is being seen by Qaddafi’s move to announce a cease-fire while using ground forces and mortars and artillery to attack insurgent strongholds. Once the UNSCR stated that there would be all means necessary used short of boots on the ground, Qaddafi knew he was free to move around and use indirect fire against opposition forces.
Hunter-killer teams need to be in Libya identifying artillery and mortar sites and taking them out. If the international community is at all serious about stopping the killing and not showing their blatant hypocrisy towards Qaddafi, there would be a UNSCR against Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. don’t hold your breath.
Qaddafi’s ouster is just another tick next to a name on neo-con checklists of things to do.
reply for Jeff @ 9:46
“… no matter how the logistics of 9/11 occurred,”
Do you mean “the pissed off leftists secularist shia’s were channeled (maneuvered,) to do the work there that nobody wanted to take credit for… ? Some asked “why” answer… ” they hate us for our freedom.”
“…the main cause was the massive support to Islamic fundamentalism, particularly of the Shia Sunni variety, by the U.S. and its allies, using murderous violence to kill and outlaw leftist, union, and secular portions of a number of different countries… ”
1. demolition of the unwanted “white elephant” monstrosities ( “dueling phallics” of Manhatten… that taunt and mock the venerable old Statue Liberty over the water… ) that couldn’t secure legal permits for it. (Larry says thanks! ) “Nobody wants a 10 minute elevator ride just getting to the cubicle.” Leasing wasn’t too good.
2. Destruction of the evidence piled up in the “other building” that had a bunch of stuff in it, poof!
3. Uhh…. oh yeah, Cases Belli. or some shit like that, it means the president can do his thing.
4. Is it true the only plane allowed to fly on the 12th was loaded with been ladens, going home to wherever that was? Went home and left the [ left... holding the bag?] Are the Afghani’s shiah’s and leftists and secularists, no the psychological truth is logistics don’t matter.
It’s good that all this stuff is coming out and getting sorted out, so the nation and look forward, and rebuild the service economy. Go shopping!
PS: Of the topic, They don’t seem to be breaking the ass to put up another homoerotic gateway monument for NYC.
and another thing, archetecture that out sized and domineering, and ugly, makes humans less than ants, forget “humans scale” or anything.
“nearly as many innocent people” I meant to say.
That doesn’t read very well, but the thing is: looking forward, and… making lemon-aid, no there isn’t much good to find. This has been cynical.
Wandered off the topic, issues the towers were wrong. Something was off about it from way back.
I just saw a report on Al Jazeera English that the Bahraini government has demolished the monument that gave the Pearl Roundabout, the “Tahrir Square” of Bahrain, it’s name.
Here’s a link: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Pearl-Roundabout-Symbol-of-cnbc-3951877144.html
There’s so much destruction right now that I’m not shedding tears over a monument, but this razing of the symbol of the protesters’ desires is such a cruel metaphor.
Thanks Jeff,
between Libya, Bahrain and Yemen, the sad truth about this admin’s foreign policy is looking mighty naked atm.
Sadly, I think his econ policy is all too coherent: of the Banks, by the Banks, and for the Banks. Robert Rubinesque all the way, as was the accursed Affordable Care Act.
Personally, I can;’t wait to see how much more we are asked to ‘share the pain.’ Assumedly, though, not enough to not get his ass re-elected, though I admit that for the first time today I did have doubts.
New AP story…
From rooftops, snipers kill 46 Yemeni protesters…
Plus we now have the little contretemps between Hillary and Barack fomenting on the HIll; good for selling papers. She can play the empathetic leader pissed at his indecision and whatnot, while still playing footsie with the King of Bahrain. I think that one will turn out to be a powder keg: a proxy for Iran and Saudi Arabia. The Shiites in Iraq are reportedly seething at the Saudi tanks rolling in, but will this administration make a peep to Abdullah?
And if you look at the arms sales to the (fake) GCC…the amounts are simply staggering.
Molly Ivins redux: “The bidness of America is bidness.”
I miss Molly…! 8-(
Btw, in regards to King Abdullah, he is one shrewd operator…
Saudi king orders more handouts, security boost
Yeah; I figured Gates had Karen Hughes in his pocket, and she was chirping out the Carrots Formula for Bahrain.
Wouldn’t you have loved to see the twinkle in Abdullah’s eyes as they talked *things* over?
The monthly allowances the very extended House of Saud family receive (via Wikileaks) likely didn’t get heard by the Saudis on the street…
So…. it’s NOT OK for Gaddafi to do it to his own people, but it IS OK for the Yemeni government to do it to theirs?
I’m confused
You got it. And the reason is simple, three little letters:
O-I-L
Al Qaeda is not really the consideration, only the maintenance, if they can, of the status quo, for military bases, military cooperation, oil contracts, and other business arrangements. Gaddafi tried to raise the AQ boogeyman, but to no avail. In Yemen, it works very well for Saleh. Most Americans now know about AQ in Yemen, but very few know of the much, much larger Houthi rebellion in that country. Damn, they probably don’t even know that Yemen used to be divided in two, and the southern government was secular and somewhat leftist.
No, I don’t think so. I think the reason is that the uprising in Yemen hasn’t crossed the line into armed conflict yet. There won’t be any action in the Security Council until it does. As to when that line is crossed, it isn’t clear. If you go to the ICRC web page and search on Yemen, you won’t find a current bulletin. There are armed conflicts going on there, but the uprising, which is new, would be a subject there if it were perceived to be at the level of armed conflict. It isn’t, which means it’s perceived to be either an internal disturbance or an internal tension. It has nothing to do with oil, you can’t get any movement out of the UN for less than an armed conflict, it’s considered meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. And the primary enforcer among the permanent members of that doctrine is China.
At least the UN is aware of it…
Secretary-General Deplores Killing Of Yemeni Protesters
So did the UN Human Rights Council
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/EGUA-8F3TC6?OpenDocument
Human Rights Watch has issued a press release, which says:
Thanks for linking to this, Jeff.
The Dark Road in Yemen; Gregory D. Johnsen; 3/19/11
http://bigthink.com/ideas/31657
We give them millions of dollars to “support” US in our “fight” against AQAP, even though [for instance] we have laws against supporting organizations who recruit child soldiers.
Yemen’s Foreign Minister Al-Qirbi Admits Permission Granted, Withdrawn for U.S. Attacks on Yemen; powwow; 10/1/10
[This is the 10/1/10 discussion powwow and I had about it...lots of background there.]