A motley crew of Senate Republicans, joined by Sen. Lieberman, have introduced a bill to make Guantanamo a permanent “terrorist” prison. Once upon a time, this could have been dismissed as GOP posturing. But recent events suggest this is more likely a harbinger of the future fate of the US Naval prison, as President Obama has already pronounced that he will support indefinite detention of prisoners based on unchallenged U.S. executive fiat.
It’s hard to believe these GOP national security groupies, and their jester Lieberman, could really get this passed, much less signed by the President. But the ways things have been going, who would be ridiculed for thinking such things possible?
Human Rights First reports (H/T Barry Eisler):
Washington, D.C. — Legislation introduced today [11 May] in the Senate to force the Obama administration to declare Guantánamo a permanent prison for terror suspects will inspire America’s enemies and undermine the American justice system, a leading human rights group said.
U.S. Senators Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), along with Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Joseph I. Lieberman (I-CT), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Scott Brown (R-MA) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced the “Detaining Terrorists To Secure America Act” (S. 944) – legislation that would keep open the Guantánamo Bay terrorist detention facility for the detention and interrogation of current and future terrorism suspects. The legislation also permanently limits the transfer of detainees to foreign countries and prohibits funding for the construction of terrorist detention facilities within the United States.
A perpetual Guantanamo to match the indefinite detention policy enshrined by President Barack Obama is truly a sign of the debauched times in which we live, ruled by those whose lust for naked rule and capitalist gain are rarely hidden anymore. I presume, by the way, that the torture via isolation, sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, exploitation of fears, stress positions and drugs — all fine and “legal” thanks to the near-universal acceptance of the 2006 Army Field Manual on interrogation — will continue “forever” at Guantanamo as well.
The Terrorist Who Lived Happily Ever After — in Miami
I can tell you one person who will not be sent to Guantanamo, even though he was involved in bombing hotels and tourist spots in the 1990s. Luis Posada Carriles walked a free man out of a Texas courtroom last month, only weeks before another terrorist was shot in the head, “taken out” by the “heroes” of Seal Team Six. An article in the Mexican paper La Jornada, translated and reposted at The Nation. It was translated by Machetera/Tlaxcala describes more of Posada Carriles’ fascinating career:
In addition to working for the CIA, it’s worth recalling that Posada Carriles participated in the US-supported invasion of the Bay of Pigs; that he was an officer in the US Army and that in 1976 he moved to Venezuela to head the intelligence service in that country. That same year he was arrested after being accused of being the mastermind of the attack on the Cuban airliner, and escaped before facing a civil trial for what was at the time the worst terrorist act in the hemisphere. In 2001, he was arrested in Panama, for planning to kill Fidel Castro with 200 pounds of dynamite and C-4 explosives, in a university auditorium filled with students in 2000, but was pardoned by then–Panamanian president Mireya Moscoso in 2004, showing up a short time later in the United States. In 2005 he was arrested here, which led to the beginning of the process that ended last Friday in El Paso with his acquittal.
Posada Carriles walked on charges of immigration fraud and obstruction of justice, and not for any of his terrorist actions, for which he was never charged by American authorities. The U.S. ignores extradition requests to Venezuela. With the latest court decision, the ex-CIA terrorist can return to Miami and sip cocktails and be lionized by the anti-Castro crowd, and the host of SOF that live in southern Florida. It’s enough to make me fantasize about leading a Cuban team in the extrajudicial rendition of Posada Carriles back to Cuba, where he could face his victims in trial. (I can’t even allow my fantasies the vicarious bloodlust that many Americans seem to luxuriate in, by imagining my neat placement of a kill shot straight through the eyeball of a non-human, reviled villain, monster of all fantasies.)
Will the Obama administration and the pathetic Democratic Party supporters, who have set forth their belief in indefinite detention for those prisoners it deems “unlawful” enemy combatants, who have shown inordinate lust for murder as it tries to assassinate even U.S. citizens (Al-Awlaki), or blow up more and more “enemies” with Hellfire missiles from drone aircraft buzzing with death in the skies, will they hesitate to move against the U.S. population itself with terrorist prisons, indefinite detention for those deemed “terrorists”? Damn if we are not already more than half-way there now.
Torture is the new state religion. The arguments between those who find torture effective and those who find it ineffective are like the arguments between Catholics and Protestants in the seventeenth century, articulated with great passion and earnestness, but totally besides the point. Underlying the actual conflicts and debates is nothing more than a raw grab for power, as the U.S. seeks greater instruments of repression at home and abroad in the name of securing the world for U.S. plunder for the greater good of a small clique of corporations and a coterie of military men, academics, and spies that keep the wheels of the machine well-oiled and ready to strike.
Bravo, Senators Ayotte, Graham, Lieberman, Chambliss, Brown, and Rubio. You have brought the logic of the “war on terror” to its true purpose. You have struck at the heart of the matter, and like the loyal knights-errant of a previous era, your adventures bring back to the King matter for great celebration at the castle. I know you will be well-rewarded.



47 Comments

A bit of a rant, but in the upsidedown times in which we live, rational commentary has become, in the terminology of the former administration, “quaint.”
Very soon, the American Empire will go the way of the old Soviet Union. Washington is a leper. Utterly rotten and corrupt. These senators are preening pouting maggots. They will not be making anything permanent. They will not even be remembered.
O/T, but along the line of super-reactionary bills introduced into legislatures, I got this email from Center for Constitutional Rights this evening:
For more on this topic, click here.
This is really a kind of aside, but one could view the
arguments in the 17th century between Protestants and
Catholics as marking a transitional era featuring both the
horrors and atrocities of the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648)
and a growing consensus in most parts of Europe that
executing heretics, at least, wasn’t such a good idea.
And the “Burning Times” for women and sometimes men accused
of witchcraft continued.
In the 16th century, opposing the death penalty for heresy
was more of a “radical” perspective, with Sebastian
Castellio as a heroic champion of toleration who got
persecuted for his troubles. He was also a peace activist:
in the early 1980′s, I read a call for reconciliation he
addressed to the Catholic and Huguenot (Reformed
Protestant) parties in France which reminded me a bit of
some appeals by the European movement for nuclear
disarmament to the two superpowers in the Cold War.
It’s heartening to remember that there were dissidents and
human rights activists back then too.
Point well taken. And the excesses of the oppression of the Huguenots was to produce a Voltaire, and later the French Enlightenment gave birth to a revolution that destroyed the ancien regime.
It’s always worthwhile fighting for what is right.
From the Canadian Centre for International Justice:
It’s time for such a memorial in the US perhaps as a travelling, educational event city to city and then to reside permanently at an appropriate location. More here.
OT– Recall “The US Prevented BabyDoc from Returning in 2006, Why Not Now?” (by emptywheel, Jan. 17, 2011).
From “Montreal-Based Haitian Survivors Intend to Bring Jean-Claude Duvalier to Justice” (CCIJ.Ca, Apr. 14, 2011):
You are
“Breaking the Silence” by Loreena McKinnett (lyrics)
“But recent events suggest this is more likely a harbinger of the future fate of the US Naval prison, as President Obama has already pronounced that he will support indefinite detention of prisoners”
is something I fully support with a simple caveat that it be solely used to house those who developed and delivered torture.
After fair and open trials of course and after we regained our lost humanity.
I don’t think it would be big enough, myself.
Thanks, Jeff. A permanent jail for suspects tells us that trials are just so quaint…
Republican fiscal conservatism at its best: spending hundreds of millions of dollars on an offshore prison to convince voters that they’re “tough on terrorism.”
My statement regarding 6 Senators stands.
I was just thinking ( I kid you not!) that Our Government is Insane. Maybe a new bumper sticker to go along with my “Its Gotta Be Gaea”.
I was also thinking about the murder of “bin Laden” or whoever it was they killed and how now, terror would be ramped up again.
So, Imagine my surprise when I discovered your post, Jeff, as I went along entirely with my OTHER line of thinking of how the people and this country are being attacked and don’t even know it.
::::::::::sigh:::::::::
It’s uglier than that.
I think it’s well past time to institute the The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in *this* country.
Most of us remember the good old days when there was no “torture debate.” Everybody used to be against it, even Saint Ronald Reagan who signed the United Nations Convention Against Torture.
Not mine nor in my name.
Meanwhile, there is a House bill that will extend the “Patriot” Act for another six years. Torture, rendition, unlawful detention, warz… all the new “norm” in this abominable country.
I’m done with this American Dark Age. That bill must not go anywhere except the dust bin of history.
Mmmm, EmptyWheel treating us to some snarkiness already this AM regarding the excellent notion of a 9/11 Commission 2.0:
It’s hard to believe these GOP national security groupies, and their jester Lieberman, could really get this passed, much less signed by the President. But the ways things have been going, who would be ridiculed for thinking such things possible?
it’s hard to believe they could undermine our educational system, our roads system, environmental protection, schools, soldiers, social security, medicair and medicaid
they begin a ridiculous diatribe, fox covers it, all the koch suckers get on board and soon we are wondering how we can win much less if they will
Think Obama would sign it? Probably only if it included corporations…or maybe ONLY coporations
Expose them like this, this and this.
I guess they’re “sending a message.”
As has been noted, a War on Terror is a war against a tactic. If there is no formal enemy who can ever be defeated, it looks like we’ll be in a perpetual state of war. Which means, of course, for reasons of safety and national security, more and more power accruing to the unitary Executive. We are at war: all war all the time. Welcome to the machine.
Sidebar: Since GITMO is in Cuba, does the U.S. really have a right to be there? For how long? Dunno at the moment…need to check.
Tangential– Exposé of war and torture financiers results in stock drop
“…lust for naked rule and capitalist gain are rarely hidden anymore.”
This sums up the Village Rule in a nutshell.
The so-called War on Terror is simply American imperialism by another name. Once the Soviet Union fell, there was no power to stand in the way of the Corporations doing what they have been lusting to do since the end of the last century (read Mark Twain on that), but could only do effectively in Latin America. The only thing that will save us from total disaster is total bankruptcy (financial, that is, since we are already morally bankrupt).
“It’s hard to believe these GOP national security groupies, and their jester Lieberman, could really get this passed, much less signed by the President”
If the President didn’t want it, he wouldn’t have signed it. Lieberman was Obama’s mentor and as we saw with HCR, Lieberman delivered to Obama exactly what Obama wanted as part of his backroom deals. I expect some public posturing – as there was with HCR – but when the rubber meets the road, Obama wants this stuff.
FDL folks have been commenting recently in the wake of OBL’s death about the endlessness of the GWOT. Along these lines, one of the things that is most disturbing about the possibility of making GITMO permanent is how detention is meant to be as endless as the war. Once a person is apprehended and sent to a “terrorist” detention facility, they are not getting out. There is no end. Permanent containment is the goal, not justice, safety or law. Even if one is released, the effects of the detention and torture are permanent.
What the US has got going now resembles all the other infamous prison systems of notorious totalitarian regimes. The old Soviet Gulag comes to mind. Ever see the pictures that came out about 20 years of those released from that system after perestroika and the collapse of the USSR? Remember the look in their eyes? That prison is inside them forever.
The big idea: Naked power and control for its own sake.
Tangential– Bank of ‘Mer
icas getting rid of more US jobs and audit control:But Visa and its rivals, including MasterCard Inc, American Express Co and Discover Financial Services, are also trying to figure out ways for people to buy things with their phones in physical stores. McCarthy said that a previous, separate Visa pilot to test smartphone payments with Bank of America Corp and other large U.S. banks will be commercially available this summer.
LOVE Loreena McKinnett! Thanks.
“Torture is the new state religion.”
Indeed. And like the Inquisition, the life of a person once detained is over. The only variation being that if they “confess” under torture, they will be given a Christian burial.
“one of the things that is most disturbing about the possibility of making GITMO permanent is how detention is meant to be as endless as the war. Once a person is apprehended and sent to a ‘terrorist’ detention facility, they are not getting out. There is no end.”
I really wish there was more questioning on this by the media. I think getting answers on indefinite detention really gets to the heart of the matter. What is their exit plan for ending GWOT? When will indefinite detention end? So many things point to it being a permanent fixture here.
Have you forgotten that the Pravdaganda issues out of the White House for the spin cycle, that Geithner and H. Clinton are Kissinger BFFs, and JP Morguen’s man is the POTUS’ chief of staff? The bankstas are running that bread and circus show and there is no “exit plan.”
clarification– the comment is for spanishinquisition
How about Cuba declaring the agreement to lease Guantanamo to the US to have been breached by the US violation there of universal human rights, in the form of torture, indefinite detention, lack of due process, etc. and just kicking them out? Spain might just back them, too.
The GITMO detention facility has an “Abandon All Hope” feel to it. I would also like to see the Cubans raise a ruckus about the US violations of human rights, thereby negating any lease agreement. (And wasn’t such ‘agreement’ the result of earlier imperialism?)
I hope Spain also continues its investigation into torture, rendition, deaths, and other horrors. I don’t see justice happening here.
Last, I think Jim White pointed out that the JSOC still carries out rendition and takes the disappeared to black sites. Obama stopped the CIA from such activities (due to pesky Congressional oversight?), but the JSOC has more freedom to operate in this way. Another example of personal power, and the powers of the unitary Executive.
“Abandon All Hope” makes “Arbeit Macht Frei” sound aspirational.
Today’s DemocracyNow.Org broadcast features Spanish Judge Baltasar Garzón on Bin Laden’s Killing, Holding Torturers Accountable, Universal Jurisdiction, and His Threatened Ouster From the Bench (hat tip fatster) which I think is worth a look. Also see what Canada is contemplating.
Again: Pres. George W. Bush was correct
We’ve seen how Obama a one point simply wanted to move Guantanamo to Illinois (hat tip Jeff Kaye) and many other disturbing aspects of the true nature of our incarceration nation (a bit more here). Want to do more? Cuéntame’s “Immigrants For Sale” campaign
Huh?
Think it’s time for Cuba to start to demand that strip of Cuba Guantanamo is sitting be returned to Cuba.
That’s actually a really good idea. I wonder if the Cubans have thought of it, or do they have bigger fish to fry? Spain might back them – I can see that. All of the Bolivarian states, too.
Yes, the question of renditions is still very much alive, and something I will be writing on very soon. It’s not just that DoD/JSOC gets a free ride on this, but apparently, the U.S. is outsourcing renditions as well.
I missed her Baltimore concert years back which folks just raved about and then she quit touring the US. No scheduled performances (her website, Quinlan Road) right now. :-(
I think that it’s important that *we* make it our own regardless of what Obama thinks or does.
Looks like David Cole at the New York Review of Books agrees with me in this, that this bill is something dangerous, that could be enacted, and that Obama’s track record suggests he won’t stand up against it. Cole practically begs Obama to do so. I think my attitude on this is already clear from my article, but I suggest interested readers take a look at Cole’s piece, Guantanamo After Bin Laden.”