Hillary Clinton was on This Week with Christiane Amanpour this morning. They talked about events in the Middle East (boring repeats of Susan Rice’s wah-wahs on NBC’s Hairdo Show), and Amanpour even zinged her with the fact that under Obama, funds for ‘democracy and freedom’ were half what they’d been under Bush, and could only go to NGOs approved by the Mubarak administration. Ms. Clinton took strong exception to that; when Amanpour said, “It’s indisputable,” Hillary in fact disputed it, pointing out that there are “differences in approaches under the same set of guidelines…that lead to…wah…wah..wah… Fail.
Sorry, Hillary, it is indisputable; the dollars spent are a matter of public record. Now you might have argued as some of the other folks in the administration did, that Obama was simply trying to repair relations with Mubarak, but maybe that trial balloon hadn’t helped in the past weeks, either…
But the point of this diary is this: Amanpour prodded, “The State Department just added an Arabic Twitter account and a Farsi Twitter account. What do you expect to with that?”
Clinton answered very brightly, her face almost manic with exhilaration:
“Well, what we expect to do is be communicating through the new social networking media with literally millions of people around the world, because we want them to hear directly from us what our policies are. We want to use it to rebut some of the falsehoods and accusations that are unfortunately made against the United States. But mainly we want to be in the mix with this incredible young, energetic population that is seeking the same rights to express themselves as young people in the United States.
Now call me a cynic (it’s hard not to be these days), but I’m betting that some of the corrections of falsehoods aimed at the US might be pretty funny depending on which truths you already know, and many you suspect.
Consider this a contest of sorts: What US policies will Rosey Clinton and Rosey PJ Crowley promote in Arabic and Farsi?
She already started out with the “Of course we support democracy; it just that we are experienced enough to know the history of how difficult the journey toward…wah wah…wah.” (Sorry: I’m predisposed to cynicism against such paternalism…)
And it would be great if any of you who know Arabic or Farsi keep us up with tweets going out from the State Department.



25 Comments

Lovely piece, content, tone and all.
thanks, wendydavis.
Cynicism and contrarianism are the only means left, and good ones too, by which we’ll know the truth.
Next tweet: “The reason the President vetoed the Palestinian’s statement calling the Settlements illegal was that we think the United Nations is the wrong venue to put forward the peace process…and…wah wah…”
(Oops; they actually DID say that one, WTF?) UN Security Council Resolutions are counterproductive to Peace? Arrggh!
Well at least they aren’t sending Karen Hughes over there again.
Recc’d, thanks wendy.
Thanks, missling (by the by, is it ‘miss ling’ or does ‘missling’ have a meaning?); but it’s a contest!!! What’s your tweet? Some days all that’s left is laughter; take it where it comes. ;o)
Like “We support Democracy and Freedom; we always say that. There’s just a time and place for it. We’ll check with Abdullah and get back to you.”
Our girl Karen was a Real Smart Bomb, wasn’t she? LOL! Where’s your tweet, Rusty dear?
Foggy Bottom is absolutely useless imho…! 8-(
Btw, CNN had a scrawl under the screen while Qadafi’s son was blaming foreigners and drug addled protesters for all the violence… Which said ‘Clinton was gravely disturbed by events in Libya’…! Sound familiar…? *gah*
Tweet: “Hi, incredibly young and energetic populations of Arabdom! This is Hillary from the USA, twittering you from the Israeli Embassy in Washington. I’ve seen all of Omar Sharif’s movies, he’s awesome. I have to go now, but let’s stay in touch.”
ROTFLMAO, Rusty! ‘Stay in touch’ made it Art, IMO!
Damn, these days have some humor about them, no?
She’s hangin’ with Oprah? Bibi? Polly er whatever Petraeus?
Tweet: ‘Gravely disturbed by Unconfirmed Murders…er…misbehavings…er…Urging restraint, here, love Hill-girl’
@HRCstateUSA – “Pal kids on playgrds becoming threat to world stabil. Need long supvisd timeouts. Thx 4 that IDF!”
*heh* Good job, wendy and ET…!
Today’s Haaretz: Thank you, Obama
@HillgrlUSA-”Chnse moms got it right! Takes villge, takng names!”
‘
“Abbas not hypcrte; playing chess, not chkrs!” “Bill hearts Fggy Bottms!” “King o wrld!” “Urge patience; $ on way.”
Who the hell is Omar Sharif, that’s all I want to know. I called Hillary to find out, but she hasn’t returned my call yet.
*heh* Hypocrite doesn’t even begin to describe this individual, PA Foreign Affairs Minister: ‘Hamas sold its spirit, independence to other countries’
This is gonna leave a mark… Shalit family blames Netanyahu for failed swap talks
“Shalit’s father Noam told Israeli Radio there ”enough talk and excuses” and demanded that Netanyahu see to their son’s release.”
Only made it halfway through CTuttle; poison wore me down. Not too open to humor just now. Wait. Mmmmm….
“HRC-Fck liar Assnge!”
(okay; nothing funny about it)
Shalit Sanity trumps Bibi.
You might like M. Levine; Obama’s Pretty Words Fail.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/201121882356449949.html
“We want to use it to rebut some of the falsehoods and accusations that are unfortunately made against the United States. But mainly we want to be in the mix with this incredible young, energetic population that is seeking the same rights to express themselves as young people in the United States.”
Huh oh oh, this can’t be good, the U.S. providing “clarification”. Well, the young seem to be managing pretty well on their own. Having the State Department send you tweets is probably about as popular as an adult at a sleepover.
Good analogy, sailcat. Does State really think that Happy Explanations and ‘being in the mix’ will neutralize Arab rage about Obama vetoing the Security Council resolution calling settlements illegal? The more I read, the more fury I gain ocer Obama/Clinton…oh, the whole craven lot of them.
The U.S. security council veto on the settlements will likely propel the democracy movement in Gaza and the West Bank.
Yes, and I’m trying to think it through, sailcat. Israel’s response may be swift and thorough. Obama’s pouring gasoline into the ME fires may have long-term benefits for Arabs and Muslims, but it’s sure not what caused O to pull out the veto.
It was this shit:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/145007-cantor-hoyer-continue-to-press-obama-to-veto-israeli-settlement-resolution
I am so angry my throat is raw from yelling at him. Had dreams of being taken to a mental hospital, LOL!
Wendy, I agree Obama reacted to Congressional opposition to the resolution (and also the Israeli lobby) in issuing the veto. But welcome to unintended consequences. The Palestinians are planning a day of rage in response to the veto and are finding their voice. The anger over revelations by Aljazeera of Palestinian compromises with a disingenuous Israel are no doubt another factor in the mix.
Just wrote it out, sailcat. I can breathe better now, LOL!
And I just saw this at the Guardian:
“Reuters has filed a story corroborating our report on the Libyan armed forces attacking parts of Tripoli (see 5.07pm). The news agency reported that military aircraft attacked crowds of anti-government protesters in the Libyan capital Tripoli on Monday, according to al-Jazeera:
A Libyan man, Soula al-Balaazi, who said he was an opposition activist, told the network by telephone that Libyan air force war planes had bombed “some locations in Tripoli”.
He said he was talking from a suburb of Tripoli.
No independent verification of the report was immediately available.
An analyst for London-based consultancy Control Risks said the use of military aircraft on his own people indicated the end was approaching for Muammar Gaddafi.
“These really seem to be last, desperate acts. If you’re bombing your own capital, it’s really hard to see how you can survive,” said Julien Barnes-Dacey, Control Risks’ Middle East analyst.
“But I think Gaddafi is going to put up a fight. I think the rumours of him fleeing to Venezuela are going to prove wide of the mark. In Libya more than any other country in the region, there is the prospect of serious violence and outright conflict.”
Bombing your own capital?? The end?
On DemocracyNow this morning they interviewed Libyan poet and scholar, Khaled Mattawa -
“I think the regime is over even if Gaddafi manages to survive,” Mattawa says. “Libyans are saying, ‘Yes we will have a new constitution, perhaps we will have a new flag. But we do not want you or your father or the rest of your plan, so get out of here.”