We’ve all learned a lot about the horrific and likely results of solitary confinement through the reported plight of Bradley Manning, and background reading we’ve done, and the cavalier attitude of our President, the officials at Quantico and within the DoD and Secretaries of the Military. I know many of you share my dark thoughts about Quantico Commander Colonel Dan Choike and Chief Warrant Officer Denise Barnes for continuing to keep Manning under a Prevention of Injury Watch allowing such barbaric treatment, and Barack Obama for refusing to involve himself with it.
It’s all too easy to forget that Manning’s torment is being repeated many thousands of times each day, and for many prisoners in the country, over the course of years and sometimes decades.
More and more studies have reported on the severely deleterious effects of this often punitive incarceration, including the US Bureau of Prisons Commission, and yet the practice is still on the rise.
If one major shame is this simple fact, the other is that no one knows how many prisoners live this way.
Authors James Ridgeway and Jean Casella of Solitary Watch write that “Every day in the US, tens of thousands of prisoners languish in “the hole”, but that many states deny that they even use solitary confinement, but instead speak about ‘Secure Housing Units’, ‘Special Management Units’, or ‘Administrative Segregation’, but most states don’t report on their occupancy rates. Apparently it’s not required; seriously?
Supermax prisons are estimated to house 20,000 prisoners in solitary, and Human Rights Watch and other organizatons that track the practice believe that as many as 80,000 inmates live in solitary on any given day in the US. Perhaps 80,000. But no one knows for sure.
Some cells are concrete-walled with beds and ‘desks’ of poured concrete or steel, with a steel sink and toilet; often the fluorescent lighting is on 24 hours a day; some prisoners report that they live always in the dark.
Prison journalist Wilbert Rideau, now free, said in his memoir In Place of Justice that when he was on death row in solitary confinement at Angola prison that he was housed in a metal cage ‘smaller than a bathroom’. Other reporters claim many are smaller than those housing dogs at kennels. The average time out of the cells is about an hour a day, three – five days a week for exercise. In some prisons books are permitted. Most are windowless, just walls… and steel doors with slots through which food or medications are passed. If prisoners are allowed visitors, they are shackled, and most visits occur through a square foot of thick plexiglass.
The US prison population has exploded over the past decade, but the use of solitary has outpaced it at a rate of almost 2:1. Guards and wardens like it; they have so much control over prisoners that it make their jobs easier. I suppose it makes sense that the prison guard unions lobby appropriate legislative bodies to keep the system in tact, but we don’t have to be comfortable with the fact. I’m not.
The Wikipedia entry for Solitary confinement addresses the proponents of the practice, and this is all the space I’ll give that side of the argument:
“Those who accept the practice consider it necessary for prisoners who are considered dangerous to other people (“the most predatory” prisoners), those who might be capable of leading crime groups even from within, or those who are kept ‘incommunicado’ for purported reasons of national security. Finally, it may be used for prisoners who are at high risk of being attacked by other inmates, such as pedophiles, celebrities, or witnesses who are in prison themselves. This latter form of solitary confinement is sometimes referred to as protective custody.”
What are the roots of this burgeoning practice? Oddly enough, it seems to have had its inception in 1829 in Pennsylvania, where Quakers believed that inmates would benefit from communing with God in the silence, undistracted by other prisoners. Now, of course, the American Friends Service Committee works diligently against prisoner abuses.
Bonnie Kernes, writing at thirdworldtraveler.com draws one of the most complete synopses I’ve read on the subject. She writes that the practice was largely abandoned once it was discovered to cause so many mental breakdowns, and was revived in the early seventies in experiments into behavioral modification or ‘control’, which sometimes included beatings, torture and psychological abuse. In fact, in 1890, the United States Supreme Court came close to declaring the punishment to be unconstitutional.
Kernes reports on yet another shame:
“The development of control units can be traced to the tumultuous years of the civil rights movement, during which time many activists found themselves in U.S. prisons. We believe this use of isolation stems directly from the brain-washing techniques used during the Korean War. Sensory deprivation as a form of behavior modification was used extensively for imprisoned members of the Black Panther party, members of Black Liberation Army formations, members of the Puerto Rican Independence Movement, members of the American Indian Movement, white activists, jail house lawyers, Islamic militants, and prison activists. At one time or another, they all found themselves living in extended isolation, sometimes for years on end. Many political prisoners still live in isolation, not because they have received charges for infractions, but because of who they are and what they believe.”
In 1972 the fist control unit prison was constructed at Marion, Illinois. In 1983 an episode of violence caused prison officials to ‘lock down’ the prison, keeping inmates in their cells 24 hours a day. That lockdown has never been lifted.
The idea spread, and in 1995 the first Supermax was built in Florence, CO; the ‘worst of the worst’ are said to be housed there, though it’s been proven not to be precisely true, but there are plenty of Bad Guys there, many of whom are watched continually lest they communicate with others and spread their messages to other ‘terrorists’ in the wider world.
That we hold our citizens in solitary who are politically inconvenient is horrific, but it leads us to another monumental injustice: many prisoners in constant isolation are mentally ill. It’s hard to know the exact numbers, but a psychiatrist writing for Human Rights Watch says:
“The use of segregation to confine the mentally ill has grown as the number and proportion of prisoners with mental illness have grown. Although designed and operated as places of punishment, prisons have nonetheless become de facto psychiatric facilities despite often lacking the needed mental health services. Studies and clinical experience consistently indicate that 8 to 19 percent of prisoners have psychiatric disorders that result in significant functional disabilities, and another 15 to 20 percent require some form of psychiatric intervention during their incarceration. Sixty percent of state correctional systems responding to a survey on inmate mental health reported that 15 percent or more of their inmate population had a diagnosed mental illness.”
And very little mental health help, if any, nor little understanding by the medical community, as they also report.
Solitary Watch is the place to visit for updates on issues (Brad Manning for one), and personal stories of inmates who’ve experienced human contact free imprisonment; all are heart-and-gut wrenching. But for me, there was one tiny quote that made me reel like no other, and I can’t say why exactly.
It was from Robert King, one of the Angola Three, about whom Anita Roddick inspired Vadim Jean to make a documentary film titled In the Land of the Free.
“The only one of the ‘Angola three’ at liberty, Robert King, said his ability to see distance was permanently altered by his years alone in a cell. “I had no concept of how you actually looked further, as a result of living in such a small space,” he said.
(King now campaigns for the release of Woodfox and Wallace. The men’s isolation stems from their conviction for the killing of a prison guard, found stabbed to death in the early seventies in Louisiana State Penitentiary, also known as Angola.)
“International treaty bodies and human rights experts, including the Human Rights Committee, the Committee against Torture, and the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture, have concluded that solitary confinement may amount to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment in violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment or Punishment. They have specifically criticized supermax confinement in the United States because of the mental suffering it inflicts. Whatever one’s views on supermax confinement in general, human rights experts agree that its use for inmates with serious mental illness violates their human rights.”
[Update]: I should have included prison rape in this diary; I will now. From solitarywatch.com:
An estimated 88,500 adult inmates — 4.4 percent of prison inmates and 3.1 percent of jail inmates — reported at least one instance of sexual victimization in the previous year, according to a 2010 Bureau of Justice Statistics report. At a Hughes Unit prison in Texas, the facility with the highest rates of reported victimization, 8.6 percent of inmates reported being sexually assaulted by another inmate. Sexual victimization by guards is equally as prevalent. In the Crossroads Correctional Facility in Missouri, the male facility with the highest rates of guard sexual misconduct, 8.2 percent of inmates reported being victimized. At the women’s Bayview Correctional Facility in New York, 11.5 percent of inmates reported sexual victimization by guards.
When a prisoner comes forward and reports a sexual assault, he or she is more likely to face retribution than redress. Complaining prisoners frequently face retaliatory harassment, discipline or further abuse. A full 25 percent of inmate victims are summarily sent to solitary confinement, according to the Department of Justice’s own numbers.”
As my daughter used to say about injustices she’d witness when she was a child, “That’s just not right.” And given the fact that more and more prisons in the US are being privatized, the more likely this Cruel and Unusual practice may become unless we make it stop.
Colorado presently has a bill to limit the use of solitary under consideration, and Maine is considering one.



37 Comments

Thank you Bradly Manning for awakening non-prisoners to the horror of the US penal system.
It’s a shame good posts won’t become recogmended diaries unless they receave turse comments to get a discussion going.
PS I am slightly computer challenged and don’t know how to recomend a diary.
There’s a blue thingie that says ‘Recommend’ at the bottom of each diary; don’t worry about it, Richard. I think lots of us forget in our hast to comment. Yes; thanks for saying thanks to Bradley Manning; I wish I had thought of it myself.
We should be sooo ashamed or our nation over this, and many other respects.
Thank you, wendy, a very important and timely diary.
Our humanity, OUR humanity is on the line … as all these many things are done in OUR name, yours and mine.
Recommended to the consideration of all at FDL.
DW
Quakers should be in charge of prisons. Then, there would be no torture.
Wendy & FDL, I was in Federal Prison for 9 years. I have been in solitary confinement. I wrote a book about my case.
http://www.amazon.com/Just-Cause-Facts-Government-Corruption/dp/1419609068/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1301427615&sr=1-1
I worked hard for 5 years to write my story and I hope each PERSON on FDL reads it.
I would strongly recommend putting George Bush in the Super Max until he died. Its much worse than execution. If they put me in the Super Max I’d beg them for an execution.
Bradley Manning is an American hero. If I was President I would charge every person involved with torturing Bradley Manning and they would be put in the super max for at least twice the time they put Bradley Manning in there. I’m against torture. But I’d order them treated exactly the same way they have chosen to treat Bradley Manning. Strip them naked and freeze them.
Please read my letter at this link.
http://overthecoals.blogspot.com/2011/03/bush-warned-more-than-forty-times.html
Well said. That’s just not right. It’s not. Separating criminals from society is necessary, sadism is not. recc’d
Its a huge mistake to compare Bradley Manning to anybody in a super max. Most 95 to 99% of the inmates put into a super max are very dangerous, very nasty people. None of the people on FDL would want to be around the people sentenced to a super max.
Bradley Manning isn’t convicted let alone sentenced.
When I was in the hole in Springfield (there are 2 holes there) and I was in both. The really bad one I went to recreation once. It was a smaller cage than the cell and no bed or chair. There was no sense going to recreation.
I just watched both videos. If you watch the TV shows about prisoners in real super max prisons, those prisoners are completely different to the inmates in the videos on here.
In my personal experience, the TV shows are the real deal. There is one story in my book about an inmate who came from the super max Marion, IL. He went straight to the medium where I was. That never happens in the BOP. He held a nurse captive with a shank in the medium.
You need to read my book to get the details.
http://www.amazon.com/Just-Cause-Facts-Government-Corruption/dp/1419609068/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1301432001&sr=1-1
Welcome, DW. As you say, there are so many things now done in our names that it’s harder and harder not to feel the incredible weight of them all in our daily lives.
I confess this took me a lot of days to research and string together; I’d have such revulsion that it would affect me physically, and I’d need to take breaks.
Well, if they were all a certain sort of Quakers; I’ve found that all are not like the ones in Peacable Kingdom, at least here. Many I’ve found with very clay-ish feet about war, at least.
But the Friends as the SC do important work in the field, and are dedicated to it.
Dear God, Screwed; thank you for telling us. I’ll read the letter soon, but I confess I have trouble reading printed pages any more, so I can’t swear I’ll read the book.
I am so sad to hear you were both in prison, and especially in solitary. Your words about death being preferable were mirrored by many of the stories I read. I know it would be for me, too I would seek the harbor of insanity early.
Punishment would need to stretch much farther than Bush…to Rummy and Cheney and Yoo and Jeffrey Miller and; well…the list is long.
A lot of it seems to depend on what sort of person you hope comes OUT of a prison, doesn’t it? Some they seem to hope never do, and not just the most violent, but also the Politically Undesirable.
Sadism. Cruelty beyond what’s necessary. You’re right.
Yet people get out of Supermax, so they must not all be the Worst of the Worst. In fact, a friend’s Navajo foster son was put in Florence for stealing and having a gun with him. He got out, but he was never right afterward.
No one bothered to comment until I did. I wish I could get more comments on my articles, but all I do is get others more clout. This one needs spreading regardless,
http://my.firedoglake.com/richardkanepa/2011/03/29/the-people-united-can-always-be-exterminated
I really hate to tell you this, KarenM, but Quakers invented modern solitary confinement in the U.S. — they invented the penitentiaries that people from Europe traveled to the United States to see in the early 1800s, the penitentiaries that became Philadelphia Prison.
http://missioncreep.com/mw/estate.html
http://www.phila.gov/prisons/history.htm
People should be aware of this document on solitary confinement: Stuart Grassian’s deposition in the Madrid v. Gomez case that caused some reforms in the practices at the California State Prison system’s Pelican Bay SHU.
http://www.prisoncommission.org/statements/grassian_stuart_long.pdf
Worth the read.
And you didn’t even mention the rape that goes on in the Prisons and how that isn’t prosecuted. *G*
Great diary,rec’d.
Thanks, Ondelette; I linked to it above. It’s great. He also has weighed in on the bogus report on Supermax in Colorado. I didn’t link to that. I went to include his name in the tags, and just couldn’t think of it.
Lots of readers don’t come here until the evening, Richard, and sometime I forget that, and my diaries drop off before night if I post them in the morning. Thanks; will read as I have time.
She may have read that in my piece above, but meant that they have made up with it since, no? ;o)
No; but some of the links have some stories. Didn’t one video? I swapped those here and there; there were sooooo many.
Many guards must be monsters; not just any old job.
Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and others prate and posture with self-righteous indignation about the offenses of foreign regimes that we don’t like, shamelessly condemning other nations for doing the same or similar things that we do. Ours is a great nation in many ways, but we’re far from perfect and the partisan, secular American version of papal infallibility in which people pretend that their guy, their party is blameless and pure is nauseating and doesn’t fool many people abroad. I’ve seen far too many self-proclaimed progressives laud or connive at Obama’s doing the same things for which they once condemned Bush.
Obama himself is far too deep into wrongdoing to clean things up, and there are very few on the political horizon who could or would do so. I’d like to propose something radical and un-American: we should consider respect for the constitution and laws in our voting.
“I’ve seen far too many self-proclaimed progressives laud or connive at Obama’s doing the same things for which they once condemned Bush.”
That’s exactly one of my arguments when centrist Dems bring up Republican strawman President: at least the Dems would be kicking back!!! Now we get yawns and excuses, and the same tired argument about why O can’t achieve anything. He has simply ceded too many moral positions for me to vote for him.
That said, he was amoral on Manning, but prison reform and outlawing solitary can happen state by state except in the Federal prisons. Not a priority for any Dems; don’t want to be seen as pussies on this or war or gun control or pot legalization or….sigh.
It’s true. Quakers are the sweetest people, especially KarenM. But everyone’s got a dark past. The people who invented public education in the U.S. were the Puritans.
Voluntary solitary confinement has been practiced for centuries as a path to enlightenment. Cf. Dunhuang.
Highly recommended. Thanks, Wendy.
I’ve reviewed everything herein. I broke my boycott of Amazon.Com (I’m boycotting Amazon because of their corporate behavior regarding WikiLeaks; more here) to go scan the pages of your book that are up. So, in the late 1980s you attempted to come forward as a victim of a crime regarding copper futures manipulations conducted by the chairman of the COMEX?
Similar to the unconscionable behavior toward persons in sanatoriums, elder care facilities, foster homes, and special needs or mentally disabled adult assisted living facilities. Compassionate and skilful care takes special, trained people who deserve a decent wage, benefits, retirement and scheduled time off as the burnout rate is very high. Privatization makes any corruption and neglect in any such facilities even worse to the point that torture and deaths is de rigeur.
“The Alcatraz of the Rockies” in Fremont County, Colorado? Without knowing more, that seems excessive.
And corrected in the diary text; thanks.
Welcome and thank you, Jeff.
We never understood it. He was accused while there of stabbing another prisoner; don’t know the details. He kept telling his foster mom that he was innocent; no Colorado politicians would get involved claiming that of course he was guilty, or the prison wouldn’t have extended his stay. It’s obviously leaving out the legal procees, but finally they had an in-house trial, and he was released from the place. He never did the crime inside; it’s all wacked.
AJE has this interview with Brother Cornell West up; at about 13:30 he discusses not just the MICC, but the prison-industrial complex, and the criminal justice system in the US as the third largest employer: a lot Marshall Plans Against the Poor.
He is seriously peeved with Obama.
http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/rizkhan/2011/03/201132863311584728.html
I am all for prison reform and more of a focus on education/rehab, particularly for first-time offenders and those with short terms of sentence (frankly I also agree our controlled substance sentences lead to a lot of the problems in our penal system); however, solitary confinement is not torture and is necessary when dealing with dangerous prisoners. Or should we release them into your backyard to sing cumbaya and hold hands?
At least people in most of those institutions can have outside advocates, not that they all do. And many foster care homes and even commercial foster care homes really try very hard. One of the girls we fostered once told me that her friends told her we were doing ot for the money.
We gave her the money to control; she agreed on what portions would go for what. She was mightily abashed to discover how much we paid out of own pockets for her care. ;o) That said, there are some stinkers in the SS system, and casworkers with twice the caseloads they should have.
Same for public defenders, nursing homes as you say: too few CNAs and LPNs to do the work well, and crap pay. Turnover is enormous.
As you say, the jobs likely never have benefits; same for child care. Why do we think we can trust people we pay two bucks an hour to care for our kids? Crazy world we’ve designed, isn’t it, mzchief?
You certainly retain the right to believe solitary isn’t torture; but perhaps you didn’t read above to see how it can lead to mental breakdown? And there are likely ways of treating dangerous prisoners that isn’t so retributive and hostile and damaging.
Your final sentence, though, alerts me to the fact that you aren’t serious about a longer or more thoughtful response.
Although most of the cited authority in this article are fringe and with a skewed political bent, I’m pretty confident I could find reliable penological studies to support that premise (leading to mental breakdowns, etc..). However, simply noting the issue offers no solution. And if your solution is to release them into general population I disagree. If your solution is reforming the drug laws (noting I’m not a proponent of the sham, disingenuous argument called medical marijuana), then I agree but don’t think either of us are dealing in political reality.
As for the relation to Manning, I think a good argument could be made that his level of incarceration is aggravating a preexisting mental health disorder; however, I genuinely believe that the Marine Brid is doing this (are seemingly most of the world) because Manning has demonstrated some suicidal thoughts and made self-injurious statements.