The so-called ‘Father of the Egyptian Revolution’ was the shy and relatively unknown former peace activist now turned orchid-grower Gene Sharp. Now 83, Sharp is slowing down, but is about to publish another book, and must marvel at the success his writings on nonviolent revolution and especially “From Dictatorship to Democracy,” which was used as an overarching guide to revolutions, both successful and failed, around the world, including Serbia, Myannmar, Burma, Tunisia, Egypt and different of the color and blossom revolutions. A WikiLeaks cable said a year ago that Syrian dissidents were training with Sharp’s work.
He has been the object of various smear campaigns by autocrats including Hugo Chavez and top Iranian officials, one of which included a cartoon video portraying Sharp as a CIA agent teaming up with John McCain and George Soros to overthrow Iran’s government. (grin) Sharp had studied Gandhi and Thoreau and subscribed to their notions that: (from the NYT)
”… power is not monolithic; that is, it does not derive from some intrinsic quality of those who are in power. For Sharp, political power, the power of any state – regardless of its particular structural organization – ultimately derives from the subjects of the state. His fundamental belief is that any power structure relies upon the subjects’ obedience to the orders of the ruler(s). If subjects do not obey, leaders have no power.
In Sharp’s view all effective power structures have systems by which they encourage or extract obedience from their subjects.
States have particularly complex systems for keeping subjects obedient. These systems include specific institutions (police, courts, regulatory bodies) but may also involve cultural dimensions that inspire obedience by implying that power is monolithic (the god cult of the Egyptian pharaohs, the dignity of the office of the President, moral or ethical norms and taboos). Through these systems, subjects are presented with a system of sanctions (imprisonment, fines, ostracism) and rewards (titles, wealth, fame) which influence the extent of their obedience.
Sharp identifies this hidden structure as providing a window of opportunity for a population to cause significant change in a state. Sharp cites the insight of Étienne de La Boétie, that if the subjects of a particular state recognize that they are the source of the state’s power they can refuse their obedience and their leader(s) will be left without power.”
The nonpartisan group International Center on Nonviolent Conflict had gone to Cairo a number of years ago and taught tactics from Sharp’s 198 Methods of Nonviolent Action. Now famous activist Dahlia Ziada attended the workshops, tailored flash scenarios to her imaginings, and communicated them widely through Facebook.
They followed Sharp’s dictate that non-violence is best pragmatically, as any violence provokes autocrats to crack down, and “If you fight with violence,” Mr. Sharp said, “you are fighting with your enemy’s best weapon, and you may be a brave but dead hero.”
Followers have learned that every autocrat or powerful entity has weaknesses; they provide an opportunity for skewering them with either humor, fact, or outrage, or sometimes all twined together.
Of the 198 tactics listed at Sharp’s A[lbert]Einstein website, some included are: protest parades with flags, lights or symbolic colors, mock funerals, skits and plays in public, walk-outs, vigils, displays of protest art, protest singing, picketing, mock awards ceremonies, leaflets and pamphlets at events, symbolic reclamations of institutions, public disrobing (assumedly as symbolic of suffering or casting-off of oppression)…
So that’s the background. Now: US Uncut is encouraging and coordinating Flashmob actions around the nation; they seem to have riotous fun delivering their messages. They really want to let you know that if an action isn’t planned in your area, MAKE IT HAPPEN! The sky would be the limit, but I do love the production numbers with song and dance, which would obviously take some writing, rehearsal and musicians. But think of the community-building that would occur during the efforts. There are other youtubes, but this is the most recent one from San Francisco at our favorite bank: Bank of America. Cue the production (hope you enjoy it):
(cross-posted at dagblog.com)



92 Comments

Come on, peeps; this is some fun activism! How many of you are looking for ways to build community with like-minded activists, dig into your creative powers, laugh, dance maybe, sing…and kick some corporate assholes in the balls with delicious skewers?
Read the Uncut site; groups and actions are forming and scheduling events: you can make things happen!
Revolutions start when two people talk to each other, and spark others to action! It’s spring, when a young activist’s sould turns to…ACTIVISM!
Wendy, this put a smile on my cynical, frowning face!!
Thank you, and yes, we are getting active again. Took 2 months off from activism when I felt overwhelmed by the corruption of our Wa state politics and how much personal studying it took to even have a clue as to what was going on.
I feel like a lethargic citizen now,[ you got to keep working it]. No point turning into Corporate roadkill at this stage of the Class War……
Thank you!
Wonderful, openhope! We played this video over and over and hooted and howled! All over Britain they’ve been happening; mostly young folks, but not all.
NO CORPORATE ROADKILL! Let’s set it to music and choreography! I’m brain-dead tonight, and have been batting zero re-writing old tunes. If you think of any, do post them. ;o)
Call and response to drumming could be fun, too, and wouldn’t need quite the prep time.
Thanks for liking it.
IMHO protests need to be noisy disruptive and controversial. Flashmob’s aren’t. They are more like superbowl ads that appeal to everyone.
This was a very successful action yesterday in San Francisco that got attention across the US and Canada: FreshJuiceParty.com – Where’s Our Change Video
There was nothing angry, violent, lewd or illegal about what was done. You *want* to do things like this. Further, it’s extremely unpopular for police to bust the heads of such folks– especially really *hot* singers and dancers.
Check it: “Official Seattle Glee Flash Mob Video” – Seattle, Westlake
“each of us has given you $5,000″ -FreshJuiceparty
Now what’s the political message in that?
I’m not going to bellyache about the good ol’ days (2 months ago in egypt). But if this political message is effective, it’s good.
IMHO, 1 problem is that FreshJuiceParty is speaking for the American MAJORITY already. Obama doesn’t need to hear that little tune, he needs to hear the real passion of our people.
Flashmobs seem to come in all shapes, sizes and colors around the world. There were many in Britain at which actors/protestors got knocked around arn arrested.
I think that if a group chooses a target, the messages can be tailored to the group writing the sketches and their potential audience with an eye toward maximum utility, as in: “How many are getting the message?”
Often satire/humor gets through because our defenses aren’t piqued, but curiosity to hear more IS instead.
That said, in Egypt some of the mobs were less subtle, as in painting red, bloody footprints and letting passers-by hearing that it was the Trail of Mubarek. So…
My house is still early morning quiet; perhaps later when I can make sound on my laptop I can dig up other ideas on youtube and bring them here.
Here’s one from UK Uncut, marinara.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZoszLM6a2c&feature=related
Rewind that video and watch it again. Obama was thrown off balance; the slick PR plans engineered by a vast minority were skewered. No score.
Now, check out the next video of the real Obama that was caught at the same San Francisco fundraiser:
“So Much for that Trial?” (by Michael Whitney, Friday April 22, 2011 8:17 am)
Oh.My.DawG! Again that flashed through personal networks like greased lightening. The peeps hate a lying liar.
Then check this out:
“On Bradley Manning’s Guilt, Who Will Be Barack Obama’s John Mitchell? (By: Teddy Partridge Friday April 22, 2011 8:49 am)
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you pawn them and totally take over their media operation.
The Yes Men do it again: “BP Imposter Crashes Oil Spill Summit” (video, Apr 19, 2011)
EXCELLENT!
Fun, aren’t they PP? Here’s another from the Showdown in America folks who were on Bill Moyers Journal back in the day…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSt8KDFDhIE&feature=related
They also run the Show Me the Note! mortgage (MERS) program:
http://showdowninamerica.org/
And you keep humiliating them with… The Truth. ;o)
- The Yes Men
Yes Men’s Guide to High Level Pranking” (video)
Here’s some of the video footage of the event described: “‘The Yes Men’ Make Corporations Say, ‘Oh, No!’” (also see “Tribute to Reggie“)
Yes Men prank targets controversial oil pipeline giant Enbridge and its proposed Northern Gateway project (photos, Mar. 17, 2011)
Interesting diary, Wendy.
I’ve been thinking about the subject of flash mobs for awhile, pondering writing a guide for people who want to organize one, document it, and make sure it is not taken off of Youtube for copyright violation. Maybe after this semester is over, grades turned in….
A couple of observations:
1) Gene Sharp may be a genuine hero, but the neo-libs have co-opted a lot of his dynamic, through agencies such as the International Center for Nonviolent Conflict, which is sometimes funded by the Freedom House, which is often funded by the extremely neo-lib (with both neo-libs and neo-cons on its board) National Endowment for Democracy.
2) Your essay neglects that some flash mobs are more equal than others. Those supporting global BDS against Israeli Apartheid tend to disappear from Youtube quite rapidly if there is any weakness in how they have used their musical material. Copyright infringement is the usual “reason” for removal. OTOH, GBLTQ flash mobs rarely have to put up with this. I’m trying to raise awareness among anyone contemplating flash mobs against Israeli crimes to use material that cannot be removed from video niches over this or other issues.
Thanks, mzchief; can’t wait. Later this afternoon; my chores are calling me. ;o) I got sucked into watching some videos of quantum mechanics and other theories from The Elegant Universe. This is 3 out of 7; you might get a bang out of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unJ2ajHH-94&feature=related
Thanks, Edward. I’d guess it left out more than that, but the links to Sharp’s 198 book is above. I did not know that “but the neo-libs have co-opted a lot of his dynamic, through agencies such as the International Center for Nonviolent Conflict, which is sometimes funded by the Freedom House, which is often funded by the extremely neo-lib (with both neo-libs and neo-cons on its board) National Endowment for Democracy” and I’m not sure how germane it is to Uncut and other organizers, but you can say how.
I did see at either electronicintifada or occupiedpalestine one of the silent versions they’d put up after it was taken down for alleged copyright infringement.
So please consider that you did just raise our awareness, Edward, and thank you. We’ll look forward to your guide one day.
I did actually think that ICNC was one of the organizations the Obama administration had punished for “their ‘in-kind’ contributions to people who know terrorists” or whatever, so I assumed they were some of the good guys. NGOs aren’t all equal, either, as we know from Afghanistan and Iraq.
Great catch. *More*
@ mzchief April 23rd, 2011 at 9:28 am
Thank you! In another inkspot of propinquity, for another diary at another site for which I dug out the Elegant Universe clips, the OP had written a sort of haiku from a dream state about the physics of being sill but in motion,…well, you get the drift.
He added if we had anything along certain lines to add, we should; one of course, was Buddhism. I’ll take it over yonder to him. ;o)
Boy, this diary faded fast…
Congrats, Wendy, on being ‘frontpaged’…! Your efforts are being widely read and greatly appreciated…! *g*
Crikey, CTuttle; the honor goes to Gene Sharp, the Color Revolutions and UK and US Uncut for their dedication and ingenuity in understanding the importance of non-violent methods to undercut dictators and Oligarchs.
I remember how many in Cairo Square held up signs with messages to us in the US, hoping the winds of change could reach our shores, too, and help us free ourselves from the slavery brought to us by neoliberal economics and trumped-up shocks to our system.
Ironically, you were just bidding me a fond adieu for the nite, eh…? ;-)
And thank you to the powers here who front-paged this and want to celebrate this with us: WE CAN ROCK THE NATION AND HAVE FUN DOING IT!
Damn, begging and pleading are so unattractive, but please permit me to say that I am a bit broken now in body, and unable to go out and organize a flashmob, can I ask you to do it if it works for you?
You could put a message in the newspaper, on on your favorite social networking site, and ask for volunteers; solicit folks who might make a song, a sketch, and choose targets who deserve some righteous skewering. US Uncut is full of ideas and planned actions, and I linked to Gene’s 198 ideas at his A.Einstein website. Be creative, have fun, and LET’S NOT LET THE BASTARDS WIN WITHOUT A FIGHT!
“Sout al Horeya”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAEt6QJJi-c
Story of my life, CTuttle; gettin’ it wrong… ;o)
This sounds like a lot of fun.
… and Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and….
Congrats to you too, M’dear…! ;-)
It must be. I’m tempted to do a flash mob here in Alaska before I write my guide on how to do one. I was thinking of doing one at one of the Anchorage Costcos over Sabra and Tribe products, but nobody seemed interested. I tried. Alaska!
Maybe when I’m in Seattle this summer.
The righties are due for some serious skewering. I’ve been appalled that, for example, people are taking Paul Ryan seriously……the man makes NO sense and should be laughed off the front pages. I’d like to hear one sensible group say, “Oh, Paul, you are so silly!” If it takes citizens banging pots and pans and marching, then so be it.
By this time next week half the members of flash mobs will be undercover FBI/DHS informants and agent provocateurs.
I have had such a good time. Whoda guessed, and this time, not a snark.
Sounds like a great recruiting strategy. Get the FBI/DHS to do our work for us.
Amen and Om Tao to that, Edward.
Bzzzzzzzzzzt! ;o)
i don’t think it’s the humiliation (which just pisses off TPTB, and worse can backfire and generate sympathy for them) — it’s your ability to provoke the TPTB into exposing the truth about themselves in an amusing and memorable way.
even better yet, by being fun, your work seems to combine elements of community building (part of a “constructive program” needed to complement the kinds of nonviolent actions sharp lists)
excellent!
can you tell us more about your overall strategic plan for achieving your goals?
p.s. i’m a big big fan of sharp for strategic nonviolence… but i think it’s important to recognize that his work can be used for both good and not-so-good causes. that’s one reason i think ideals of principled nonviolence need to be included as well.
This is a very important point:
Notice the expressions on the bank tellers’ faces. They love it because they know that US Uncut is telling a truth that they cannot change but which they experience themselves as individual taxpayers.
In Egypt it was very significant when the revolution got so big that the rank-and-file army would not fire on the protesters (likely because they were related to some of them). The difference between Egypt on the one hand and Libya and Bahrain on the other is that the state has gone to great lengths to ensure through the use of foreign labor that the instruments of state power – security forces and elite military – will not refuse to obey. From the perspective of the foreign workers in the security forces, in a time of trouble they are in the position of forced labor. Refusal to defend the state does not free them, it’s complicates their lives and might endanger them. And even in Bahrain the government had to call in 2000 Saudi troops.
There is a reason that in Yemen and Syria, the protesters were chanting “peaceful, peaceful” — both as a reminder to themselves in the line of fire and to the state security.
So what does it mean in the US not to be obedient on a massive scale to the orders of the rulers? Despite all of the celebration, the number of demonstrators willing to continue to occupy the capitols in Wisconsin and Michigan were insufficient to overwhelm the state police, who were under command of the governors. And the police unions, sympathetic to the protesters, knew the state police were caught in a bind themselves; they knew that if they disobeyed, the governor would fire them and hire folks more willing to rough up the protesters. The power structure really was never threatened and the energy diverted into the politics of recall. That might be the locally strategically best thing to do but it does not wind up dealing with the issues of power that must at some point be dealt with.
Which brings up the point that in the US, the instruments of repression have to do more with withdrawal of economic livelihood than of political rights (Bradley Manning and others being dramatic exceptions). What would it take for lower level managers to refuse to fire people arbitrarily or for people in HR and IT to together refuse to process the paperwork? What would it take for IT workers in a government shutdown to refuse to process the payroll for members of Congress? “What would it take…” means “How far would people have to be pushed by the power structure..”
Flashmobs like US Uncut reminds this old hippie of the YIPpies. They took one dollar bills, went on the tourist tour of the New York Stock Exchange, and threw the money onto the trading floor. The exchange stopped in its tracks while floor traders scrambled to scarf up the one-dollar bills. That makes an important educational point about the way the system works, as does the Pay Up calls in a bank lobby. It doesn’t however threaten what holds the system in being. The popularity among some of the public of the shut down the government and pay off the debt arguments of the right has to do with the realization that the interest on the national debt really is a transfer of funds from ordinary taxpayers to the tax cheats like Bank of American who buy up billions of US Treasury bills to hold as the “conservative” and “capital preserving” part of their portfolio. But that is an insight not expressed publicly by these people…exactly and precisely because they have an extreme of job fear.
Thank you for this delightful video. And the provoking quote about Gene Sharp.
If it’s not fun, I don’t want to be part of your revolution. But it also has to be courageous. I remember that the civil rights movement was won by people who disobeyed Jim Crow laws and insisted on living like other Americans. But it took an outside power to stay the hand of the state law enforcers who would allow their goons to murder with impunity.
You have to be very precise about the power structure that you are calling for people to disobey.
To deal with too big to fail banks, move your funds to credit unions. The hitch is to take away your contribution to their assets as well as their liabilities. Refinancing your mortgage with someone else doesn’t necessarily do this because you might find that Bank of America Countrywide or Wells Fargo Wachovia or Citibank has purchased your mortgage from the originator. Savings and loans were created to provide a mortgage alternative, but they got deregulated, taken private, and caused the asset bubble and fraud of the eighties (Google Charles Keating).
What part of the vampire squid do you focus on?
big difference between strategic nonviolence and principled nonviolence. sharp’s work can be used for both for purposes we applaud and abhore.
What happens when the FBI/DHS don’t serve the power structure either?
More targets than you can shake a stick at, Dearie. Corporate tax dodgers, TBTF Banks, all of Wall Street, the DoJ, Corporate civil rights violators; such a list… ;o)
The FBI agents go back to their Mormon stakes?
fyi, for anyone who wants more about how sharp sees power flowing from the people, even in the case of dictatorships, or has any questions about the bit wendydavis quoted from the nyt, i highly recommend an early (and short) book by sharp, Power and Struggle (Politics of Nonviolent Action, Part 1).
it was one of those reads which has permanently changed how i see the world.
jmo, but i think that’s part of the difference between stage one and stage three as described by bill moyer (not moyers) in his book, doing democracy (please excuse the abundance of idealism in the quote if that doesn’t appeal):
Your comment is rich with good points, Tarheel. There are so many diffuse movements out there online, and some are having limited successes. IMO, as people may realize that they can indeed hold more and more power from the superstructure, it may embolden them to take bolder moves.
When people suggest general strikes as a tactic, it makes me think that behind every striker in the days of yore [;o)], it took supporters and community behind them, making sure all had food, utilities, health care, etc. to get by on.
I guess I see the potential for this sort of directed fun and commitment as a community-building and trust-building endeavor, too, which will serve all involved well. Whichever writers have declared that we no longer function as a society, but as individuals with sometimes common purposes, is right, IMO. and we sincerely need to change it, especially in the anonimity so prevalent in cities.
I’ll be reading your comment again for sure; thanks.
Humm….the head or the soft underbelly.
Thanks, selise.
thank you! great diary!
And the eyes and ears? They are becoming more and more intrusive through the bourgeoning Security Apparatus: listening, wiretapping, having access to cellphone records and GPS in some cases, expanding data bases in the name of criminality, but not really; credit reports, shopping habits, social network contacts, etc. The less they know the better, but that ship has sailed. The new battle is Internet Freedom, and there are so many disagreemnts about what any current bills actually portend, IMO.
Great subject; so many creative activists!
Good insights.
But the problem in practice right now is identifying the powerholders. Focusing on Congress or the President doesn’t do it in the age of Citizens United. Wisconsin drew public attention to the Koch brothers buying of state and local governments. Jamie Dimon has also been in the public limelight because of his own statements. But those are the only visible powerholders to much of the public. Corporate power depends on anonymity of the powerholders, which is why Koch Industries is not publicly traded. Powerholders are the people who control the corporate institutions and hide behind the corporate “veil”.
In the absence of clear focus on the actual powerholders, much activity is diffuse. So in the first stage, the main secret we must discover and expose is who is actually running the country. Not accusations or suspicions, but actual knowledge of how the mechanism works.
Logistics of even single-day large protests (such as the 1963 March on Washington) require so many people that folks advocating we need to have a million people hit the streets next Friday don’t understand what they are asking for.
Always a pleasure to see ya on a thread, selise…! *g*
I can’t help thinking of Bilbo and Smaug.
excellent analysis.
any further thoughts on how to peel the onion? the more i study, the more layers i find.
howdy CT!
I dunno about the ‘humiliation’ being counter-productive, selise. It may depend on the target, but when I first read at AJE about the people who had been studying Sharp’s non-violent methods in Egypt and Tunisia, several said that humiliation of the dictators was key in that it undermined their authority so much.
They even gave examples; wish I could remember, and I couldn’t find the stories for this diary. I suppose different groups would try to think through their targets and tailor the tactics and nuances to them.
So many extractive minerals companies, too, as possible targets. You’ll figure something out. ;o)
A dozen or more years ago Mother Jones did a major investigative piece named something like “The 25 Most Powerful Men (yeah) in the US You’ve Never Heard About”. It was true, and their point beyond exposing them was that they were the powers behind the power, and didn’t require any limelight in the public sphere, a departure from the Trumps and so many other narcissistic uber-wealthy power-hoarders.
Call Matt Taibbi!
One of the things I like about Uncut, how local they are. But yep, there are so many impracticalities of traveling long distances to demonstrate; after all, we’re not the mobile, hitch-hiking hippies we once were. ;o)
Pre-(the first) Gulf War, events were organized all over the nation; pity was, there was zero MSM coverage. We’d have to hear about the participation stats from friends in other nations whose papers might have covered the demos. Now, there are ways of knowing, hah!
For dispatching Smaug was it the place below his breastbone? I’ve forgotten C.
We need a million Bilbos and Frodos.
One must keep in mind that large protests are to an extent threatening to the general public. Why ? Because they have been conditioned from the very first that disobedience will be met with sever consequences and most people have not had any negative encounters with authority outside of a speeding ticket or DUI.
So they fear this kind of large scale action. Remember that those who protest now in the middle east and elsewhere do not fear it as much simply because they have had to live with constant repression and retaliation.
A smaller Flash Mob style action would be less of a threat to the general public but would get the message out as well. Maybe even get some to join in when they feel safe to do so.
I believe so. Though it has been a while since I read the Hobbit.
wendydavis, agree re cultural context. i don’t know enough about egypt or tunisia (hell, i probably don’t know enough about my own culture) to have an opinion.
but at an early stage (vs later stage when public has already been won over and is mobilizing), i have seen even simple “challenges” (ie questions and/or alternative info that might at worse show an “authority” to be mistaken) generate a backlash as those who identify with the “authority” circle the wagons to “protect” their leader from even being questioned.
maybe it’s today’s politics of personality, but my sense (i have no real knowledge about this) is that it is more about human nature and the defensiveness one feels when some part of our world view feels threatened (i’ve seen this dynamic play out here at fdl on several occasions when honest dissent has provoked a pile on and even sometimes a banning).
that’s why i think that any kind of humiliation of an authority, especially while subjects of that authority identify with him/her, is potentially problematic.
that’s the strategic analysis.
from the standpoint of principled nonviolence, care is taken to leave open the possibility of reconciliation with members of the opposition (including leaders) with face saving options and the social goals are always given priority over desire for revenge (even if just a little humiliation). great leaders such as mandela and gandhi have been able to do this, even when severely provoked.
Good point, and if the participants are having fun, it would work to dispel fear, yes? One point of the flashmobs seems to be the spontaneous feel to them. Posting videos onyuoutube expands the coverage a lot.
Here’s a video primer on Bail-ins. Very positive. ;o)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIHg3-xYJlI&feature=related
Non-violent protest as an agent of change is a misnomer. “Suicidal protest” is a more correct description because the reality is, when people protest non-violently to the degree that they might cause real change, the PTB retaliate violently. Peaceful, non-violent protestors are assaulted, incarcerated, tortured, “disappeared”, and then openly killed in droves, by hundreds, even thousands. (Witness Syria, Myanmar, Iran, etc.)
It is only when (or if) the carnage reaches such an extreme level that the army will no longer participate that governments topple or real reforms are implemented. Witness the history of “suicidal protest” in the U.S. The peaceful marches for civil rights resulted in what? Violent reaction put down only by a massive infusion of federal agents (Mississippi, Alabama, etc.) or the 101st Airborne (Little Rock).
But now we have a situation where the federal government will be the enforcement mechanism, where troops trained (and blooded) in Iraq will be deployed on our streets to combat “urban unrest” and “civil disobedience”. (Ever notice how disobedience that is “civil” — as opposed to criminal or violent — must still be put down simply because it is “disobedient”?)
I’m guessing that in a country of our size, at least one hundred thousand of us would have to die before “non-violent” demonstrations achieved anything on the national level. We’d need thousands of deaths a day for weeks and weeks and weeks. (The first twenty or thirty thousand deaths would not be reported on much by the MSM, who would be seriously frightened — for themselves — by how the government reacted.)
Singin’ Kumbayah and witty ditties ain’t a-gonna get the oligarchs and their privileged minions to give up power that it’s taken them a hundred years to amass. Not easily, that’s for sure.
If I was organizing massive “non-violent” protests, if I somehow became a modern day white MLK, the first thing I’d do is give every protestor an on-line “death preparation kit”, a how-to for getting your affairs in order: will, trust (for minor heirs, if applicable), living will, funeral arrangement instructions, etc. Because a whole lot of us were gonna die for the cause.
The power structure always preaches “ballots, not bullets”, but when control of the ballots isn’t enough, the PTB are the first ones to resort to bullets.
If you read the history of the civil rights movement, media coverage was not that great of the Montgomery bus boycott. Little Rock was only in the news because Ike federalized the Arkansas National Guard. Not until the DOJ under Robert Kennedy intervened in Mississippi and Alabama was there coverage on any sustained basis, which is what allowed Birmingham to be covered and the country to be moved–by scapegoating racism in the South and ignoring it when it showed its ugly face in Cicero and Southie. The 1963 March on Washington was not the beginning but the capstone of an eight-year-long movement, primarily coordinated by A. Phillip Randolph and Martin Luther King and involving a huge coalition that leveraged off a then-active labor movement.
Only the 1963 march got anything like the coverage that Tahrir Square received. And the voting rights movement, Mississippi Freedom Summer got coverage only when a civil rights worker was killed.
The media has to be played. We have forgotten what Randolph and King knew.
Social media penetrates the media blackout only to the extent of activists’ trusted networks.
Very good.
You forgot Kent State.
Wendy’s gonna hate this but.
So If we have a civil war, we have a civil war. So be it !
Nonviolent protest depends on moral suasion of either an overwhelming majority within the society or the outrage of forces outside the society. People who undertake nonviolent protests should understand the risks and should have the logistical support to minimize them as much as possible. Singing Kumbayah and witty ditties is for the sake of the courage of the movement, not for influencing the oligarchs. Read Bernice Johnson Reagon’s “The Music Kept Us from Being Paralyzed: A Talk with Bernice Johnson Reagon,” in Black Notes: Essays of A Musician Writing in a Post-Album Age, William C. Banfield, 2004. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland.
Massive nonviolent protests happen after you have already won. It is hundreds, thousands of smaller acts of civil disobedience that get you to that point.
And part of the discipline of non-violent protests are to get your affairs in order, knowing that some person in authority might decide to crack down hard.
I would not be so paranoid about the troops that served in Iraq. Moreso than the cheerleaders who couldn’t be bothered to go, they know what went on and who really was on their side both in trying to protect their lives (by preventing the war, by advocating for body armor and up-armored Humvees, and by supporting their families) and who was just full of flag-waving empty talk.
The first order of business in dealing with the current powers that be is to strip away the anonymity and shine a bright light on the impunity. The tyrant is the economic elite, unlike in the Jim Crow South when it was the political and cultural elite. Indeed in some localities – Atlanta, the “city too busy to hate”, much of the Carolinas and Virginia, protests were met with quick capitulation of Chambers of Commerce on public accommodations issue, fearful as they were of the loss of investment by non-Southern investors in economic development in the South. Which is to say that the civil rights movement is somewhat an easier case that what we face, which is closer to the economic tyranny of pre-Civil War slavery in its tenaciousness.
~~~ModNote: For the record – Advocacy of violence as a solution to current political problems is not tolerated at Firedoglake and affiliated sites.~~~
Excuse me Wendy. Gene Sharp isn’t the father of the Arab revolution and hardly anyone knew who he was. Giving him credit has insulted many of them, as if they can’t do it without the white man and it’s another type of neocolonialism. They have many of their own authors.
This guy is one of the original organizers, he’s a labor organizer and attorney.
http://www.arabawy.org/
http://elhamalawy.purephoto.com/#/image/1326/12432
Here’s a critical look at Gene Sharp. Read the apologies and peans and then read this:
Sharp Reflection Warranted
Nonviolence in the Service of Imperialism
by Michael Barker
Tweets just today:
Where it has been used by the State Dept through training and distribution it’s evident in the stickiness of the actual revolution. Countries that have no underlying actual grass roots organizations independent of the “sponsor” are co-opted by the neoliberals quickly. Most of the countries that had these color revolutions are now suffering terribly.
Wendy, I didn’t see Edwards comment above, before I wrote mine below. It’s laughable that Gene Sharp is trying to take credit for Tunisia. I guess he’s never heard of Mohammed Bouazizi, unless one of his methods was lighting yourself on fire.
One of the criticisms with advertising the date in advance, can possibly explain why Tunisia and Egypt were more successful, is that communication flew under the radar and the PTB weren’t prepared for it. In Egypt, the Mukhabarat was looking in workplaces for signals of inspiration from Tunisia, but they ignored facebook and twitter. Also they have illegal labor unions that did the ground work. Libya was co-opted before it even started.
Here’s the story according to Hossam el-Hamalawy, he gives credit to the Palestinian intifada for showing them how to do it.
If the State Dept. didn’t see that the kettle lid was going blow off they weren’t looking.
I dunno, kisses. I absolutely agree that so many detractors of the Egyptian dissident movement were wrong in saying it was all spontaneous with no long-term planning and thinking behind it, thus doomed to fail. They were also proven wrong in claiming that the agricultural workers in the north were stout Mubarek supporters, at least in the end.
I thought that many in Egypt credited the April 6 movement with many of the long-term efforts, and that it was comprised of professionals and intellectuals. The stories I’d read were that they had worked with folks from the Otpor! movement in Serbia, which had directly relied on Sharp’s suggestions, and had helped bring down Milosevic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otpor!
point taken.
agree with all of your comment except the bit “hardly anyone knew who he was” as it’s the ideas not the person that is important. but that is a minor nit.
your points re where the credit lies are imo right on and very important. thank you for them.
“…by scapegoating racism in the South and ignoring it when it showed its ugly face in Cicero and Southie.” Yes; I hope we all learned more about this during our debates over the ’causes’ of the Civil War’; I know I learned more in 3 days about the issues during heated discussions at another site at which I blog than I had over the rest of my life. ;o)
Good point about the CR movement leveraging off the labor movement, but also the churches via Social Gospel helped enormously, IMO. ‘One Nation Working Together’ has attempted to form a large coalition of populist groups including people of faith (if I said Good Faith it might sound biased; hope ya’ll know what I mean). ;o)
Great comment.
Point taken, kisses, and I didn’t mean to be another adherent to ‘Arab Exceptionalism’, even a sideways one. But Sharp’s long-time study of non-violence transcended race or ethnicity, and was useful in forming some coherent strategies and tactics in many nations.
The ‘Father of’ bit, I admit, may sound condescending; I first read it at AJE interviews with key dissidents in Egypt. Pace, if I’ve erred in spreading the meme speciously.
Mmm…you sure aren’t the first here at the Lake to remind me of this, C; my mind does not seem to want to go there. Too many decades living as a DFH to stop now, maybe. And too steeped in the idea that it’s easy to invite violence into our lives by imagining violence; same for disease, IMO. ;o)
The Barker piece is full of counter-info, that’s for sure. I’ve only followed a few of the links so far. It did remind me of the recent charges that many of the largest environmental movements are now funded by large corporations, and we don’t know how far that fact causes them to pull their punches, but it doesn’t bode well.
I dunno, kisses. Maybe all people will need to make choices which paths to follow based on available info. thanks for sharing the links; I don’t know how much weight to give the info in the scheme of pushing back against the Power. And I confess I don’t even know how to decipher A Tweet. ;o)
To be perfectly honest, I don’t see it happening here though. The American people just don’t have the stomach for it.
A split from Washington by the states or a group of them is a real possibility especially since it is becoming more and more difficult for Washington to function in any kind of reasonable and coherent manner.
Just my opinion.
I love it. Malcolm X for sure. The upper crust “Liberals” are the House N******.
I’m a field N******.
You ever visit that website? http://www.thefieldnegro.com/
Interesting site.
Here’s a good site too.
http://dissentingdemocrat.wordpress.com/
I’ll do a diary on Serbia and Yugoslavia. Otpor! is nothing to be proud of.
“He has been the object of various smear campaigns by autocrats including Hugo Chavez and top Iranian officials”
I REALIZE THAT IF ONE REPEATS SOMETHING ENOUGH IN WHAT IS THE NEW NORMAL IT WILL BECOME TRUTH: USING THE WORD AUTOCRAT TO DESCRIBE HUGO CHAVEZ IS BOTH UNFAIR AND DISHONEST! DOES IT TRULY BOTHER YOU PEOPLE SO MUCH THAT HE REDIRECTED OIL MONEY TO THE POOR?
Other than the above complaint, good post.
That would have far more traction here than Palestinian rights.
even genuine grass roots movements can (and too frequently are) co-opted or misled. and sponsored movements can develop into the real thing.
i’m not so sure it’s so easy to tell from the outside… even in hindsight.
p.s. i haven’t seen sharp trying to take credit for tunisia. linky please?
second wendydavis. great comment. thanks.
I’ll look forward to it, kisses.