A few hours ago I got an email from My President (and yours). This is the main part of the email:
What would you ask President Obama?
Tomorrow, President Obama will deliver his State of the Union address at 9:00 p.m. ET.
During that speech, he’ll lay out his vision for an America where hard work and responsibility are rewarded, where everyone does their fair share, and where everyone is held accountable for what they do.
Immediately following the President’s speech on Tuesday, be sure to stay tuned to WhiteHouse.gov/SOTU for a live panel featuring senior White House advisors answering your questions about the speech. [yada, yada, snip]
Check out WhiteHouse.gov/SOTU to learn more about watching the enhanced State of the Union online and all the ways you can ask questions this week.
Jay Carney said this about his boss’s SOTU:
“The speech will include “the principles that President Obama has brought to public service since he began his career in public service.” (Wot?)
“And I’m sure that the campaign is focused on those same ideas, because they are working to get the president re-elected.” (Wot? Ideas? Wot wot?)
Bloomberg reports:
“Obama previewed his message in a Dec. 6 speech in Osawatomie, Kansas, that invoked the populism of President Theodore Roosevelt. Economic inequality has left millions of Americans feeling that “the basic bargain that made this country great has eroded,” he said.
That means more “fairness” is needed in the tax code and in making sure that financial firms play by the same rules as other businesses, according to Obama. More details will be in the president’s 2013 budget, which will go to Congress Feb 13.” (WWTRHDAFYOND, or: ‘What Would Teddy Roosevelt Have Done After Four Years of Not Doing?’)
And from the NYT, from a leaked classified report:
“KABUL, Afghanistan — American and other coalition forces here are being killed in increasing numbers by the very Afghan soldiers they fight alongside and train, in attacks motivated by deep-seated animosity between the supposedly allied forces, according to American and Afghan officers and a classified coalition report.”
Zero Hedge has a piece up in anticipation of the SOTU; he shows some of the economic numbers, cool graphs and polling numbers; the President has a tough row to hoe tonight.
Recent Gallup polling has documented Americans’ discontent on a number of fronts, including with the economy, the overall direction of the country, the federal government, both political parties, the media, big business, education, U.S. healthcare coverage, and gas prices. Of the 24 issues Gallup polled on in the recent survey, 13 have satisfaction scores below 40%. Public satisfaction has declined by a significant margin on 9 since January 2008, including to worrisome lows on the economy and system of government. Despite recent gains in the Gallup Economic Confidence Index, the large majority of Americans in early January say they are dissatisfied with the nation’s economy.
Uh-oh. ‘ It’d all be better ‘cept for that damned Congress, and those crap Republicans.’
What would you like to ask the President? Please get some practice here. Prizes will be awarded, but they…er…have yet to be determined. All decisions by judges are final. But they…er…have yet to be determined, too. ;o)
Then consider participating tomorrow night; the man needs to hear from us, srsly. ;o)



37 Comments

I was pondering many questions, ranging from topics like indefinite detention to murder overseas, but since I know they will only be ignored, I figure, what the heck, why not pull out all the stops and simply ask:
“Mr. Prezniwit, what does Jamie Dimon’s fly look like?”
The WHY is a good start:
Why are we still killing and dying in other countries?
Many economists, partisan and non, have stated that one of the most basic changes that needs to be made to get the banks under control is separating commercial banks from investment houses/banks. Will President Obama demand that Congress do so, or can he do it himself?
(Oh, fucking-A, Alt ID; that’s gotta be in the running fer a prize.)
Is it my rather Puritanical upbringing that causes me to skip right on by the most potently salacious and prostitutionally apt metaphors?
The judges than you for your entry, and advise you to stand by for further announcements.
Ancillary question:
Do you really believe that the killing is making us safer?
Sigh and sigh, Crane-Station.
Thank you; sadly, we know he will answer tomorrow night.
love to you.
Ancillary question:
Why did your White House block any but the most rudimentary financial re-regulation, yet call the weak-sauce Dodd-Frank ‘the most sweeping financial regulation since the Great Depression’?
Judges: Pay no attention to the loudmouth editorializing on the original question. Beth asks about your asking Congress to reinstate Glass-Steagall, a perfectly legitimate question.
Addendum: Brings new meaning to the charge that the Obama administration
servesservices Wall Street, not Main Street, eh wot?Although I find the idea amusing (possible comedy), I know he doesn’t care and asking him anything is pointless.
How, President Obama, is it possible that I loathe you more than I loathed the loathsome Dubya, who at least came by his loathsomeness genetically as the ungifted child of Poppy and Bar? Why is it that I race to turn off the television whenever I see your face on my screen? What did you put in the water that made me swoon over you and vote for you and talk myself into believing that you were not just the latest in a line of filthy lying oligarchs? How does it feel to preside over the beginning of the end of the world as you know it?
How about “Dear Mr. President, what is your hat size” so when you anoint yourself King of the World we will have a crown ready for you.
I mean isn’t that the ultimate goal of all you overlords to be in total control.
P.S. if the crown happens to look like a toilet plunger it’s merely
coincidence.
The judges are disappointed that you are declining to participate, tambershall.
They will have to learn to live with it.
Bugger; I knew I’d live to regret using ‘yada, yada’ shorthand instead of pasting in the *rulebook* for the allowable content for questions.
Rule #62: Questions may only contain a maximum of six (6) derivatives of the term ‘loathe’, whether it be noun, adjective, adverb or invented form.
I apologize; you may want to amend the question for participating at the WhiteHouse.gov/SOTU forum post-enhanced SOTU viewing.
However, for this contest, you are free to add a few forms, including: loathesomely, loathsomesque, and my personal fave, loathesomicious.
Stay tuned for prize announcements. The judges accept tips.
Extra nice, quanto. ;o)
‘Acme Crown Two-in-One Converts to Plumber’s Friend.’
Loathsomicious is the past-perfect tense, if I remember my conjugation lessons correctly.
And the judges are tipsy, you say?
You may be thinking of ‘lonesomedovish’ perhaps?
Jello shots for the judges every time you go ‘loathesomewise’… Yass.
To heck with a comfortable pair of shoes, the man needs comfortable knee-pads.
So we can all agree that he’s quite the loathario? :O
@January 23rd, 2012 at 8:24 pm
Ack! Not! ;o)
Loathario FTW. Jello shots for Alternate ID. And the judges.
He’s a carpet-layer?
My question.
Mr President. When you are brought to The Hauge to face war crimes and crimes against humanity, how will you and your co-defendants like Bush, Rumsfield, Clinton (Bill and Hillary) plead?
Guilty or Not Guilty?
Knowing those slick bastards, they’ll probably plead not guilty by reason of mental defect, and it would be true: they’re mentally and morally defective, but they’re still guilty. Gavel bangs down.
Sounds as though you’re going bullish on ‘accountability’ tonight.
And that you’ll be channeling your Inner Occupier.
Does the ‘enhanced version’ of your speech come with a laugh track?
Moderator, I’d love to know how you’re getting text to wrap around the smaller videos. You know how I love down-sizing them. ;o) But I haven’t figured out the trick yet.
Thanks.
[Ed. Note - it's a bit long for a comment, so will send an email to you.]
Me too!
Thank you! I’ll share with Crane-Station. ;o)
[Sent email to the address with which you registered.]
Thank you.
Mr. President, why are you tolerating the vindictiveness with which municipalities are cracking down on the Occupy movement?
Mr President, I don’t have lots of money, actually none I can spare, therefore I won’t attempt to talk to you since I know you won’t be listening.
PS. How do you know I’m a dirty hippie when I’m invisible to you?
Ooo-la-la! Goooooooooaaaalllll!
(Especially given that he’s tryin’ to channel his Inner Occupier’ in the speech.) Meh.
Mr. President, Why did you agree to cut heating assistance to the elderly?
We’re still asking this guy questions?
Hell, I’m already looking forward to kicking Romney out of office.
(me, I’m a forward-thinker ;-)
Shoot, kgb; we’re just venting here, Mr. Forward Thinker; see?
I figure Romnabama may just lose this thing. Whoosh!
Remember awhile ago when WhiteHouse.gov offered that thing wherein if 5,000 or some threshold number of questions got ‘liked’ or something, they would answer them? And Miguel let us know that as a few got close to the Magic threshold, there was no way to load your preferences? I’m guessing this crap may be similar.
And man, is Gingrich surging in Florida; we may end up have guessed it right. Mr. wendydavis still has his Mother Jones Gingrich ‘CON-act with America’ t-shirt. ;o)
Easy one. The Campaign says that O’s teamed up with the Humane Society of America, and he cut the oil so that the elderly will adopt three dogs each.
http://www.idiomsite.com/threedognight.htm
My question:
Mr. President, who are the top three campaign donors who have the most profound impact on your policy decisions?
C-S; check your Inbox. ;o)
;o)
Form WaPo Oct.19, 2011
“As a result, Obama has brought in more money from employees of banks, hedge funds and other financial service companies than all of the GOP candidates combined, according to a Washington Post analysis of contribution data. The numbers show that Obama retains a persistent reservoir of support among Democratic financiers who have backed him since he was an underdog presidential candidate four years ago.
Obama’s fundraising advantage is clear in the case of Bain Capital, the Boston-based private-equity firm that was co-founded by Romney, and where the Republican made his fortune. Not surprisingly, Romney has strong support at the firm, raking in $34,000 from 18 Bain employees, according to the analysis of data from the Center for Responsive Politics.
But Obama has outdone Romney on his own turf, collecting $76,600 from Bain Capital employees through September — and he needed only three donors to do it.
The battle for Wall Street cash has become a crucial subtext in the 2012 campaign, which is shaping up to focus heavily on federal banking and markets policies and the struggling economy.
Top Republicans have courted major U.S. bank executives and financiers, arguing that Obama’s policies have hurt them, while Democrats are seeking to turn the erosion of support on Wall Street to their populist advantage.
Channeling ‘Occupy’ anger
Obama’s ties to Wall Street donors could complicate Democratic plans to paint Republicans as puppets of the financial industry, particularly in light of the Occupy Wall Street protests that have gone global over the past week.
In response to the protests, the Obama campaign and other Democrats have stepped up their attacks on Romney and other Republicans for their opposition to Wall Street regulations.
One top banking executive who raises money for Obama, discussing fundraising efforts on the condition of anonymity, said reports of disaffection with the president “are exaggerated and overblown.” He said a strong contingent of financiers in New York, Chicago and California remains supportive of Obama and his economic policies, even as some have turned on him.
But, this donor added, “it probably helps from a political perspective if he’s not seen as a Wall Street guy.” ”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-has-more-cash-from-financial-sector-than-gop-hopefuls-combined-data-show/2011/10/18/gIQAX4rAyL_story.html
He is a man of the people, see?
And here I was gonna quip: Goldman, Sachs, Citigroup…