Cross-posted at River Twice Research.
With Wall Street – and the Federal Reserve – in a headlong rush to declare the recession over, the economic data has indicated that the simple binary recession-no recession framework obscures more than it reveals. Yes, defined purely in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the recession looks to be winding down, with strong indications that GDP is about to turn positive after a long and painful swoon.
But GDP alone is a pretty poor proxy for the lived experience of many millions of people. Wall Street may be booming, the market rising, and many companies reporting strong profits relative to weak global economies. Yet that says little about any one national economy, even one as large and prominent as the United States (see my recent Wall Street Journal piece here http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052970203517304574306414148814226.html).
This week, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that productivity soared in the second quarter, up 6.4%. Economists will tell you that productivity is the key to an expanding economy and to keeping inflation in check. But this surge in productivity – which is unequivocally good for corporate profits – comes at the expense of labor. Unit labor costs plunged 5.8% and hours worked were down almost 7%. So even those still gainfully employed are working fewer hours as companies eke out efficiencies, do much more with less, and make money from diverse markets. As of this year, half of the profits of the S&P 500 companies will come from outside the United States. So companies are doing well, in spite of labor and in spite of the U.S. economy. If you depend on a wage and you live in the United States, this recession began before last year and is likely to last much longer. If you’re a company or if you can access the world of capital in some form or another, this recession was a brief, sharp, and very frightening financial panic that is now ending.
Retail sales – not the best of statistics given the frequent revisions and the fact that gasoline sales and auto sales can shape the overall figure and often do – were also anemic in this week’s release. While reports of the death of the American consumer are much overstated, there should be no doubt that some spending will be decreased by the absence of easy credit and by the psychological overhang of the past year.
The larger point, however, is that we no longer exist in “one” economy that can be simply described by a few select figures. The experience of people in different parts of the country and who are exposed to different aspects of economic activity will vary so profoundly that it is impossible to make any sweeping generalization. That won’t stop people from making them, nor will it prevent analysts and politicians from proclaiming the end of the recession as if that statement meant universal relief. The world has become too complicated for such simplicities, and reality will continue to be far messier than the pat statements and neat headlines that seek to contain it.
For a look at additional blogs and other writings of mine, feel free to visit River Twice Research.



4 Comments




Great diary. Right on.
As I see it, the U.S. government has every incentive to keep the dollar relatively strong. Which creates a bias toward slow (if any true) recovery and toward deflation.
Is there any plans to get people working again soon a second quicker better targeted stimulus? A second bank bailout which seems likely will ignite a firestorm from us and the teabaggers if this issue is not addressed.
Yes, in the current economic climate I view increases in productivity as a side effect of continuing job losses. I am not sure where the increase in GDP will come other than increased government spending. Employment and housing still look like disasters so depression still looks more likely than recovery.
First of all, there’s been no “two consecutive quarters of positive growth”. So, even from a technical perspective, we’re at least a few months away from declaring the end of the recession.
But, even the last reported quarter’s GDP number is a bit of a fantasy. By revising the first quarter downward by 1%, they were able to say “look! only -1% GDP! Hurray!. Pretty neat trick, huh? On top of that, part of the GDP “increase” was caused by imports FALLING FASTER than exports (but they both fell). Another bit of cool math.
But, with retail sales down (even after the cash-for-clunkers jolt) and businesses not spending on new capital equipment or on hiring workers, the only source of new money is Government spending. But the stimulus only goes so far and the states have used up their allotment from it. Now states are going to be forced to actually face the declining tax revenue issue.
Oh, and commercial real estate is about to do what the sub-prime market did last year — watch for all those empty buildings to be foreclosed — which will hit the banks hard again.
And those unemployment numbers? Have you heard of the “birth/death” model? It says that small businesses create jobs that the stats guys don’t know about, so they basically make up a number to add to the total number of jobs to account for them. Of course, they’re still adding in a number that would probably be reasonably good in normal times. But, really, they’ve added almost a million jobs that small businesses have supposedly created so far this year. How likely is that to be true?
To top it all off, the long term unemployed are just now starting to lose even their extended benefits. People who were at least spending their unemployment checks on the basics are now going to do…. what, exactly? How much less consumer spending will that result in?
This is by no means over. In fact, the worst may be yet to come.