Spanish Legislature Moves to Block Torture Investigations
According to Spanish newspaper “El Pais” the Spanish legislature is proposing new legislation to limit the jurisdiction of the National Court of Spain. The proposal, backed by both of Spain’s two largest political parties, would limit the theory of universal jurisdiction and restrict the court’s authority to cases involving defendants present on Spanish territory, or cases where the victims are Spanish nationals.
If the legislation passes and applies to existing investigations, the majority of Guantánamo related cases now pending before the National Court in Spain would have to be dropped. There are currently three Guantánamo related cases before the National Court. The first involves five former Guantánamo detainees that alleged they were tortured while in U.S. custody, a second involving rendition flights that may have stopped over in Spain, and the third against the “authors” of the torture program, namely Alberto Gonzales, John Yoo, David Addington, Jay Bybee, William Haynes and Douglas Feith.
In the case of the five torture victims, all of them are Spanish residents and one is in fact a Spanish citizen — his case could potentially survive the legislature’s current attempt to curb the National Court’s jurisdiction. Hamed Abderrahman Ahmed is a 30-year-old Muslim from the Spanish enclave of Ceuta adjoining northern Morocco, and was held in Guantánamo for two years. The Spanish press refers to him as “The Spanish Taliban.”
The timing and nature of the proposal would suggest that it is specifically designed to derail the investigations into the U.S. torture program. The Spanish government has already demonstrated its hostility to the investigation. In April, Spanish Attorney General Conde-Pumpido recommended to the National Court that it drop the case against the torture program authors, going so far as to deride the complaint as a fraud. The National Court nevertheless decided to continue investigating the matter, and it is currently assigned to Judge Eloy Velasco.
The case is currently on hold. Under the relevant provisions of the Convention Against Torture –- signed by former President Reagan — Spain can only exercise jurisdiction in the case if the United States itself refuses to investigate or prosecute the acts itself. The U.S. government can immediately stop the Spanish investigation by simply initiating its own investigation. As a result and as a necessary first step, Judge Velasco recently sent a letter to the U.S. government inquiring as to the status of any U.S. investigations into the torture program. To date, there does not appear to have been any direct response to Judge Velasco’s letter, and it is unclear how long Judge Velasco is willing to wait. It may be that the legislature’s recent action is the response to Judge Velasco’s letter, and the Spanish government intends to block Judge Velasco’s investigation while he is waiting for the U.S. government to respond.
My translation of the article can be found below, with the usual caveats about legal translation being difficult, and that I don’t speak Spain Spanish. Also as usual, corrections and clarifications are welcomed and encouraged.
May 19, 2009
The Congress of Deputies is expected to limit Spanish judges activities outside of Spain. The legislature will approve new limits to the universal jurisdiction of the National Courts of Spain, such that it will only be able to pursue cases outside Spanish territory when there are Spanish nationals affected by the case, according to a proposed resolution described by Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría, a spokesperson for the People’s Party (PP), and which, according to other reports, has been also accepted by Spanish Socialist Worker’s Party (PSOE).
The proposed legislation states its purpose as “limiting the exercise of universal jurisdiction to only those cases that have some nexus to the Spanish courts, requiring a nexus between them, whether it be the current presence of the accused in Spain, or the Spanish nationality of the victim, and to establish the subordinate nature of universal jurisdiction, and clarifying that the investigation of a crime in a foreign country should be real and not symbolic* [literally translated “fictitious”, but believe “symbolic” better captures the meaning – Ed.]
To secure the support of the PSOE, the PP has agreed to withdraw a proposed amendment to Article 23 of the Organic Law of the Judicial Branch (which covers international war crimes). This way, it will be the Government that sends to Congress the proposed legislation. The initial language proposed that for a cause “to be recognized by the Spanish Courts, it should be established that the potential defendants can be found in Spain, or that victims of Spanish nationality exist, and that in every case the country where the acts are alleged to have been committed has not initiated any prosecution or investigation of the covered criminal acts.”
The PP proposal would also modify the list of crimes that could be pursued in the National Court of Spain, adding “crimes against humanity” and deleting the counterfeiting of foreign currency.
The National Court matter remains the only active criminal investigation into the U.S. torture program at Guantánamo Bay.
Original text of the article:
El pleno del Congreso de los Diputados tiene previsto poner coto hoy a la actuación de los jueces españoles en el extranjero. La Cámara aprobará la limitación de la jurisdicción universal de la Audiencia Nacional, de forma que sólo podrá perseguir delitos fuera del territorio nacional cuando haya españoles afectados en el caso, según una propuesta de resolución de la portavoz del PP, Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría, que ha aceptado el PSOE, según fuentes populares.
La propuesta asegura que se trata de "vincular la jurisdicción universal a los casos en los que haya un punto de conexión con los tribunales españoles; exigir un punto de conexión con la jurisdicción española, bien la localización de los responsables en España o bien la nacionalidad española de la víctima y establecer el principio de subsidiariedad de la jurisdicción universal, aclarando que la investigación del delito en el país extranjero debe ser real y no ficticia".
El PP ha aceptado retirar la nueva redacción que proponía del artículo 23 de la Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial (el que recoge los delitos de justicia universal) para cerrar el acuerdo con el PSOE. Así, será el Gobierno el que envíe al Congreso el proyecto de ley. El texto inicial aseguraba que "para que puedan conocer los tribunales españoles deberá quedar acreditado que sus presuntos responsables se encuentran en España o que existen víctimas de nacionalidad española y, en todo caso, que en el país del lugar donde se cometieron los hechos delictivos o en el seno de un tribunal internacional no se ha iniciado causa penal que suponga una investigación y una persecución efectiva, en su caso, de tales hechos punibles".
Esa propuesta del PP modificaba también el capítulo de delitos que serían competencia de la Audiencia Nacional en el extranjero para incluir el de "lesa humanidad" y excluir el de falsificación de moneda.



15 Comments







Not a surprise. The government worked hard for two years to stop the trials against the CIA and the Spanish officials and military who were guilty of allowing rendition flights to land in Spain.
**************
” The trial of 26 Americans and seven Italians accused of orchestrating the CIA-led kidnapping of an Egyptian cleric will continue despite an Italian supreme court ruling that barred key evidence as classifed, a judge ruled today.
The two-year trial is the first to be held by any government over the CIA’s “extraordinary rendition” programme of transferring suspects overseas for interrogation.
At a hearing in Milan, Judge Oscar Magi announced that the politically sensitive trial could continue next week.
“All of the defence motions that sought to block the trial were rejected,” the prosecutor, Armando Spataro, said.
The American defendants are being tried in absentia. All have court-appointed lawyers who have had no contact with their clients.
The CIA has refused to comment on the case. ”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl…..kidnapping
When war crimes charges against Israel for the bombing in 2002 were initiated, there was pressure from Israel to stop the investigation. Barak called upon his buddy, the prime minister, to stop it. Seems to have worked.
****************
” Israel on Monday urged Spain to stop a Spanish judicial investigation into a 2002 bombing on the Gaza Strip, saying it “contravened the clear position of the Spanish government.”
Spanish National Court judge Fernando Andreu announced Monday that he will pursue his investigation into a 2002 Israeli bombing in the Gaza Strip, despite contrary advice by prosecutors at the court.
In response to the decision, Israel’s Justice Ministry said it was “convinced the Spanish government and judicial system will do their utmost” against a “cynical” attempt by the Palestinian plaintiffs to “exploit the Spanish judicial system in order to advance a political agenda against Israel.”
Defense Minister Ehud Barak said he would call on the Spanish government to prevent the investigation, reiterating Israel’s stance that the Israel Defense Forces is the most “moral” army in the world.
“I intend to appeal to the Spanish foreign minister, the Spanish minister of defense and, if need be, the Spanish prime minister, who is a colleague of mine in the Socialist International, to override the decision,” said Barak. “
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1082932.html
” The National Court, which tries cases of special relevance in Spain such as terrorism, is currently processing 13 international suits under the principle of universal jurisdiction, which covers crimes ranging from genocide in Guatemala to suspected torture at Guantanamo.
The resolution, presented by the main conservative opposition Popular Party and amended by the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers Party, received 339 votes in favor, just eight against and one abstention.
The United States, Israel, China and Guatemala are some of the countries that, under the principle of universal jurisdiction, the Spanish judicial system is currently investigating following complaints filed by associations and groups. “
http://www.surinenglish.com/20…..00938.html
The US seems to have built a cottage industry of derailing foreign government’s investigations into its own malfeasance.
We should add the cost of that negotiation and arm-twisting – what’s the average price of a foreign legislator’s vote, I wonder (are Spanish ones more or less expensive than Italian or English ones?) – to the Bush/Obama legacy. I’ll bet it puts health care costs in better perspective, the kind our government doesn’t want to own up to.
the pressure they are under must be amazing. wondering how we could get in touch and let them know that we support them for what our Justice Dept is not doing?
Bottomline is the U.S. government hasn’t any sense of morality, justice is just a word, the law serves to keep the status quo and the U.S public can only blame itself.
But most simply don’t give a damn.
That’s what has always bothered me the most. It seems some days like those of us who believe in the rule of law, accountability, and the principles this country were founded on have spent the last 8 years shouting on some deserted beach on a deserted island in the West Pacific. The lack of outrage or outcry is what is most dispiriting.
And the embarrassment for the citizens of the U.S. continues. Now we have an Obama administration leaning on officials in other countries to put pressure on their Courts to keep from getting at the truth. I’m thoroughly disgusted with our new president.
Never mind “pressure”, the U.S. promised to make Britain more susceptible to future terrorist attacks if the U.K. didn’t make itself complicit in the U.S. cover-up of its own torture program.
While it’s a setback for justice in some senses, this strikes me as a reasonable limitation. There’s a principle in law that says parties in a case need to have ”standing”, IOW, some stake in the case beyond the abstract. These restrictions would mean that the remaining cases would have standing. If the summary here is correct, rendition flights that landed in Spain, and any mistreatment of Spanish nationals would still be valid cases to pursue.
Don’t all of us have a ’stake’ in ensuring no one is tortured? And our ‘principle’ of ’standing’ has been misused for years, besides which it is our law,not the spanish law.
Oh, and BTW, go to Louisiana and see how you like the Napoleonic code.
Two points – the idea behind the concept of universal jurisdiction is that the crimes coming under it are international war crimes, or crimes against humanity. The nature of the acts themselves confer standing on everyone – mankind as a whole is injured by them. The more practical point is that a large majority of the crimes encompassed by the concept of universal jurisdiction are committed by national governments, or government heads. Because of that, the entities responsible for the conduct are highly unlikely to hold themselves accountable for their own acts. That’s why universal jurisdiction doesn’t kick in unless the acts are not investigated or prosecuted where they occurred. Spain can’t even initiate the investigation until the U.S. has failed and refused to investigate itself.
Obama’s active participation in covering up the Bush war crimes and refusal to hold them accountable is precisely why the universal jurisdiction rule was created – the signatories to the Convention Against Torture agreed that there should always be a forum for this category of crimes.
Yes, I know that. The point remains that it’s awfully difficult to bring about such a trial unless your prosecutors have access to actual victims. It’s much harder to gather evidence, or to get public support for the endeavor.
Spain has citizens who have been victimized, as do many other western countries. They should be able to make a case for those citizens, assuming it’s possible at all.
thanks for all the 4-1-1 Zongo
shame, I was looking forward to some actual justice administration
I see that was too much to ask
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltasar_Garz%C3%B3n
Who would we get in touch with in Spain to let them know that we support what they are doing. Holding our criminals accountable
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/h…..nberg.html